Comparisons and Contrasts of Shale Gas and Tight Gas Developments, North American Experience and Trends

All Shale Gas reservoirs are not the same. There are no typical Tight Gas reservoirs. These two statements can be found numerous times in the literature on shale gas and tight gas reservoirs. The one common aspect of developing these unconventional resources is that wells in both must be ‘hydraulically fractured’ in order to produce commercial amounts of gas. Operator challenges and objectives to be accomplished during each phase of the Asset Life Cycle (Exploration, Appraisal, Development, Production, and Rejuvenation) of both shale gas and tight gas are similar. Drilling, well design, completion methods and hydraulic fracturing are somewhat similar; but formation evaluation, reservoir analysis, and some of the production techniques are quite different. Much of the experience in shale and tight gas has been developed in the US and in Canada, to a lesser extent; and most of the technologies that have been developed by operators and service companies are transferable to other parts of the world. However, the infrastructure, including equipment and service company availability, governmental regulations, logistics, processing, environmental considerations, and pricing are not the same as in the US. This may impact the rate of the technology transfer as well as the selection of some of the technology. This paper is focused on operations challenges, technologies, and experience associated with shale and tight gas projects. It is likely that environmental concerns and the drive to reduce development costs of tight and shale gas reservoirs will drive new approaches to the development of these reservoirs in China, Latin America, Middle East, North Africa, and other parts of the world.