Back to Search
Start Over
How bilinguals listen in noise: linguistic and non-linguistic factors
- Source :
- Bilingualism: Language and Cognition. 20:834-843
- Publication Year :
- 2016
- Publisher :
- Cambridge University Press (CUP), 2016.
-
Abstract
- Bilinguals are known to perform worse than monolinguals on speech-in-noise tests. However, the mechanisms underlying this difference are unclear. By varying the amount of linguistic information available in the target stimulus across five auditory-perception-in-noise tasks, we tested if differences in language-independent (sensory/cognitive) or language-dependent (extracting linguistic meaning) processing could account for this disadvantage. We hypothesized that language-dependent processing differences underlie the bilingual disadvantage and predicted that it would manifest on perception-in-noise tasks that use linguistic stimuli. We found that performance differences between bilinguals and monolinguals varied with the linguistic processing demands of each task: early, high-proficiency, Spanish–English bilingual adolescents performed worse than English monolingual adolescents when perceiving sentences, similarly when perceiving words, and better when perceiving tones in noise. This pattern suggests that bottlenecks in language-dependent processing underlie the bilingual disadvantage while language-independent perception-in-noise processes are enhanced.
- Subjects :
- Linguistics and Language
Deep linguistic processing
05 social sciences
Cognition
Stimulus (physiology)
050105 experimental psychology
Language and Linguistics
Linguistics
Education
03 medical and health sciences
0302 clinical medicine
Rule-based machine translation
0501 psychology and cognitive sciences
Psychology
030217 neurology & neurosurgery
Disadvantage
Cognitive psychology
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14691841 and 13667289
- Volume :
- 20
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Bilingualism: Language and Cognition
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........1c57dde53a7112e59b75c8b933d93515
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s1366728916000444