Back to Search Start Over

Clinical Utility of Procalcitonin in the Diagnosis of Pneumonia

Authors :
Assen Goudev
Katharina Rentsch
Christian Puelacher
Karin Wildi
Célia Strunz
Tânia Strabelli
Priscila Goldstein
Alexandre Soeiro
Christian Mueller
Tobias Breidthardt
Arnold von Eckardstein
Luca Koechlin
Tobias Zimmermann
Jasper Boeddinghaus
Joan Walter
Thomas Nestelberger
Dayana Flores
Samyut Shrestha
Raphael Twerenbold
Patrick Badertscher
Jeanne du Fay de Lavallaz
Karsten Murray
Albina Nowak
Zaid Sabti
Aline Bossa
Mucio Tavares Oliveira
Nikola Kozhuharov
Desiree Wussler
Source :
Clinical Chemistry. 65:1532-1542
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
Oxford University Press (OUP), 2019.

Abstract

BACKGROUND The clinical utility of procalcitonin in the diagnosis and management of pneumonia remains controversial. METHODS We assessed the clinical utility of procalcitonin in 2 prospective studies: first, a multicenter diagnostic study in patients presenting to the emergency department with acute dyspnea to directly compare the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin with that of interleukin 6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) in the diagnosis of pneumonia; second, a randomized management study of procalcitonin guidance in patients with acute heart failure and suspected pneumonia. Diagnostic accuracy for pneumonia as centrally adjudicated by 2 independent experts was quantified with the area under the ROC curve (AUC). RESULTS Among 690 patients in the diagnostic study, 178 (25.8%) had an adjudicated final diagnosis of pneumonia. Procalcitonin, interleukin 6, and CRP were significantly higher in patients with pneumonia than in those without. When compared to procalcitonin (AUC = 0.75; 95% CI, 0.71–0.78), interleukin 6 (AUC = 0.80; 95% CI, 0.77–0.83) and CRP (AUC = 0.82; 95% CI, 0.79–0.85) had significantly higher diagnostic accuracy (P = 0.010 and P < 0.001, respectively). The management study was stopped early owing to the unexpectedly low AUC of procalcitonin in the diagnostic study. Among 45 randomized patients, the number of days on antibiotic therapy and the length of hospital stay were similar (both P = 0.39) in patients randomized to the procalcitonin-guided group (n = 25) and usual-care group (n = 20). CONCLUSIONS In patients presenting with dyspnea, diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin for pneumonia is only moderate and lower than that of interleukin 6 and CRP. The clinical utility of procalcitonin was lower than expected. SUMMARY Pneumonia has diverse and often unspecific symptoms. As the role of biomarkers in the diagnosis of pneumonia remains controversial, it is often difficult to distinguish pneumonia from other illnesses causing shortness of breath. The current study prospectively enrolled unselected patients presenting with acute dyspnea and directly compared the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin, interleukin 6, and CRP for the diagnosis of pneumonia. In this setting, diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin for pneumonia was lower as compared to interleukin 6 and CRP. The clinical utility of procalcitonin was lower than expected. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01831115.

Details

ISSN :
15308561 and 00099147
Volume :
65
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Clinical Chemistry
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........1bf3beb3c4cbe6963a1d34a257de9d27