Back to Search Start Over

Quantification of CD-SEM wafer global charging effect on CD and CD uniformity of 193-nm lithography

Authors :
Yao-Ching Ku
Chih-Ming Ke
Tsai-Sheng Gau
Tadashi Otaka
Hsueh-Liang Hung
Anderson Chang
Hiroki Kawada
Nelson Ren
Hiroaki Nomura
Jeng-Horng Chen
Kazuhiro Ueda
Burn Jeng Lin
Source :
Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XVIII.
Publication Year :
2004
Publisher :
SPIE, 2004.

Abstract

For 90 nm technology and below, we need to fight for every nanometer to improve the CD uniformity (CDU). New materials, especially for low-k material, bring about not only complicated integration challenges, but also new metrology difficulties such as SEM image focus failure if using low landing energy (300V) on charging wafer (e.g. -300V). The wafer global charging will also distort the CD SEM magnification and result in CD measurement error. CD SEM venders propose that the distortion be corrected by voltage contrast focus. In order to compare and quantify the measurement error correction with and without using retarding voltage focus, ArF resist non-uniform charging wafers (~ -300V) and low charging wafers (~ -7V) were prepared. Low landing energy like 300V is one of the solutions for ArF resist shrinkage. However, as the low landing energy (300V) meets the high global charging wafer (-300V), SEM cannot get sufficient secondary electron signal to construct image. Therefore, two landing voltages 500eV and 800eV were chosen for the evaluation. Three pitches 1600 nm, 460 nm and 230 nm were investigated. Two indexes are used to evaluate the wafer global charging effect on CD and CDU. One is within-wafer pitch uniformity for determining the CD SEM magnification error. The other is ArF-resist-shrinkage amplitude used to estimate the effective landing energy at charging area. The experimental results show that the pitch uniformity difference with and without using retarding focus can be larger than 2.5 nm. Similar phenomenon is also found for the line width uniformity. Resist shrinkage amplitude is significantly reduced at the highly charged area. Both results show that accurate focus procedure, i.e. retarding voltage focus employing first, is the key to reduce the CD metrology tool measurement error and improve CDU.

Details

ISSN :
0277786X
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Metrology, Inspection, and Process Control for Microlithography XVIII
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........1b0664356003c7d48a0925cd1a588a6c