Back to Search Start Over

Treatment of Subfoveal Choroidal Neovascularization-Reply

Authors :
Judith Alexander
Maureen G. Maguire
Stuart L. Fine
Neil M. Bressler
Noreen B. Javornik
James C. Folk
Suresh R. Chandra
Andrew P. Schachat
Source :
Archives of Ophthalmology. 113:138
Publication Year :
1995
Publisher :
American Medical Association (AMA), 1995.

Abstract

In reply We thank Dr Tiedeman for his careful reading of our article and his thoughtful comments. As we emphasized in our discussion, advising whether a particular patient should be treated with laser photocoagulation involves consideration of both short- and long-term effects of the treatment and characteristics of the patient such as the condition of the fellow eye. We and Dr Tiedeman are in agreement that the reason that group B patients are good candidates for immediate treatment is the reduced risk for severe loss of vision that begins at 12 months after treatment and endures for at least 3 additional years. This sustained period of lower risk for loss of vision outweighs, in our opinion, the period of increased risk immediately following treatment. Members of the Macular Photocoagulation Study Group are listed in the April issue of theArchiveson page 482.

Details

ISSN :
00039950
Volume :
113
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Archives of Ophthalmology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........13636d7f1461c5655ca5c18e35013667
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1001/archopht.1995.01100020015010