Back to Search Start Over

The predictors of successful percutaneous coronary intervention in ostial left anterior descending artery chronic total occlusion

Authors :
Hsiu-Yu Fang
Chih-Yuan Fang
Hon-Kan Yip
Cheng-I Cheng
Shang-Yeh Lu
Wei-Chieh Lee
Yu-Sheng Lin
Chiung-Jen Wu
Chien-Jen Chen
Chi-Ling Hang
Cheng-Hsu Yang
Source :
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions. 84:E30-E37
Publication Year :
2014
Publisher :
Wiley, 2014.

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) to chronic total occlusion (CTO) has become one of the treatment strategies in recent era. The ostium of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) is one of the most difficult positions for CTO revascularization. Until now, limited data has been made available for the prediction of successful ostial LAD CTO PCI. Objective: The aim of the study was to compare the differences between ostial LAD and all other CTOs and to identify the predictors of successful ostial LAD CTO PCI. Methods: This retrospective analysis included consecutive patients referred for CTO PCI between January 2001 and September 2013. Ostial LAD CTO was defined as CTO at the position whose distance between lesion and left main bifurcation was less than 1 mm. Baseline demographics, lesion characteristics, interventional procedure details, and devices were compared between the ostial LAD group and the all other CTOs group. The predictors of successful ostial LAD CTO PCI were also evaluated. Results: 621 patients who underwent CTO PCI were enrolled retrospectively to this study. A total of 70 patients of ostial LAD CTO were compared with 551 patients of all other CTOs group in this study. Ostial LAD CTO was found to have more bridging and better collaterals than all other CTOs. Procedure time, fluoroscopic time, contrast volumes, the use of contralateral injection, and the use of the retrograde approach were significantly greater in the ostial LAD CTO group. The ostial LAD CTO group also had significantly higher J-CTO scores (2.7 ± 0.8 vs. 2.2 ± 1.1, P = 0.011) and higher Syntax Scores (28.3 ± 6.5 vs. 20.9 ± 9.7, P

Details

ISSN :
15221946
Volume :
84
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........11908831fbc4f83cfc024265a322a44c
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.25514