Back to Search Start Over

Erratum: Measurement of azimuthal asymmetries in inclusive production of hadron pairs ine+e−annihilation ats=10.58 GeV[Phys. Rev. D78, 032011 (2008)]

Authors :
E. Nakano
H. O. Kim
M. Shapkin
Robin Wedd
Y. J. Kim
Y. Watanabe
H. Hayashii
Hyunyong Kim
L. S. Peak
T. Lesiak
W. Bartel
M. Dash
K. Senyo
Y. Sakai
J. G. Shiu
A.E. Bondar
T. Kawasaki
V.N. Zhilich
H. Kaji
Phillip Urquijo
M. Tanaka
T. Sumiyoshi
Jeremy Dalseno
B. Golob
D. Liventsev
I. S. Cho
Antonio Limosani
I. Tikhomirov
A. Chen
G. S. Varner
T. E. Browder
M. Starič
R. Mizuk
J. S. Lange
B. G. Cheon
Rajesh Kumar
C. H. Wang
P. Wang
D. Heffernan
Tatiana Medvedeva
J. Li
Y. I. Kim
G. R. Moloney
Y. Chao
K. Miyabayashi
H. K. Park
Y. Yamashita
Jolanta Brodzicka
S. Nishida
F. Mandl
M. Grosse Perdekamp
W. S. Hou
Y. Iwasaki
K. Vervink
Y. J. Kwon
M. E. Sevior
Masashi Hazumi
U. Bitenc
S. H. Kyeong
O. Schneider
X. L. Wang
S. Uno
J. S. H. Lee
S. Okuno
H. Sahoo
A. Ogawa
T. Uglov
O. Zyukova
C. P. Shen
S. Eidelman
Y. Teramoto
Bruce Yabsley
P. Pakhlov
J. B. Singh
H. J. Hyun
S. Ogawa
Seema Bahinipati
H. Park
A. Bozek
A. Drutskoy
Y. Choi
C. W. Park
E. Won
H. Miyake
Y. Miyazaki
H. Nakazawa
A. Sekiya
Samo Stanič
M. J. Lee
M. Bračko
A. M. Bakich
T. Ohshima
N. Gabyshev
A. Ishikawa
P. Križan
I. Adachi
S. Uehara
H. Ha
Y. Unno
C. Liu
A. Zupanc
O. Nitoh
H. Palka
L. E. Piilonen
G. Pakhlova
D. H. Kah
R. Chistov
R. Seidl
T. Zivko
S. McOnie
H. Miyata
Y. Hoshi
H. Aihara
Y. Usov
K. Hayasaka
Z. P. Zhang
Hikaru Kawai
Source :
Physical Review D. 86
Publication Year :
2012
Publisher :
American Physical Society (APS), 2012.

Abstract

In the original article, it was found in Monte Carlo simulations that the reconstructed A₀ results are roughly consistent with the generated asymmetries, while the A₁₂ results systematically underestimate the generated asymmetries. This underestimation can be attributed to the difference between the reconstructed thrust axis and the original quark-antiquark axis. The corresponding correction factors are 1.6 ± 0.04 for the A₁₂ results and 1.11 ± 0.05 for the A₀ results. Because of a flaw in the original analysis program, these correction factors were not applied to the AUC-type asymmetries in Table V as well as in some figures. In addition, a small mistake in the error propagation in the charm correction resulted in slightly underestimated statistical uncertainties. These omissions affect all but the charm asymmetry results. The correct central values are therefore given in Tables IV and V of this Erratum. The systematic uncertainties of the original publication remain unchanged.

Details

ISSN :
15502368 and 15507998
Volume :
86
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Physical Review D
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........0f1f0014ee2f22f570147b6ddcd76542
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevd.86.039905