955 SUBCUTANEOUS VERSUS TRANSVENOUS IMPLANTABLE CARDIOVERTER DEFIBRILLATORS IN CHILDREN AND YOUNG ADULTS: A METANALYSIS

Introduction The Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) has been demonstrated to successfully prevent sudden cardiac death in children and young adults. A wide range of device-related complications/malfunctions have been described, which depend on the intrinsic design of the defibrillation system [Transvenous (TV-ICD) vs Subcutaneous (S-ICD)]. Objective To compare the device-related complications and inappropriate shocks with TV-ICD vs S-ICD. Methods Electronic databases were queried for studies focusing on the prevention of SCD in children and young adults with TV-ICD or S-ICD. The effect size was estimated using a random-effect model as Odds Ratio (OR) and relative 95% Confidence Interval (CI). The primary endpoint was a composite of any device-related complications and inappropriate shocks. Results We identified a total of 5 studied including 236 patients (Group S-ICD: 76 patients; Group TV-ICD: 160 patients) with a mean follow-up time of 54.2 ± 24.9 months. S-ICD implantation contributed to a significant reduction in the risk of the primary endpoint of any device-related complications and inappropriate shock (OR:0.18; 95% CI: 0.05 - 0.73; p=0.02)(Figure 1). S-ICD was also associated with a significantly lower incidence of inappropriate shocks (OR:0.28; 95% CI: 0.11 - 0.74; p=0.01) and lead-related complications (OR:0.18; 95% IC: 0.05 - 0.66; p=0.01). Otherwise, a trend towards a higher risk of pocket complications (OR:5.91; 95% CI: 0.98 - 35.63; p=0.05) was recorded in patients with S-ICD. Conclusion Children and young adults undergoing S-ICD implantation may have a lower risk of a composite of device-related complications and inappropriate shocks, compared to TV-ICD patients.