Back to Search Start Over

Comprehensive genomic profile by Foundation Medicine test in guiding routine decisions for second-line treatment in advanced non-small cell breast cancer (NSCLC): Preliminary results of lung-ONE study

Authors :
Rosario Garcia Campelo
Luis Garcia Palacios
J. Terrasa
Antonio Calles
Enriqueta Felip
Federico Rojo
Juana Campillo
Isidoro Barneto Aranda
Javier de Castro
Reyes Bernabe Caro
Rafael López Castro
David Aguiar Bujanda
Alfredo Paredes
O. Juan-Vidal
Source :
Journal of Clinical Oncology. 38:e21555-e21555
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO), 2020.

Abstract

e21555 Background: Lung-ONE study aims to determine the clinical utility in making decisions on planned 2nd line therapy in advanced NSCLC based on a comprehensive genomic profile (CGP) test as FoundationOne CDx or FoundationOne Liquid and describe alterations found on these patients. Methods: Lung-ONE included advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients being treated on first-line, with molecular diagnostic wild-type (or unknown) for at least ALK, EGFR, and ROS-1 genes. Patients treated with targeted therapies or immunotherapy were excluded. This interim analysis describes the findings of CGP from patients of Lung-ONE with driver genomic alterations (GAs) and the investigators decision to change the planned second line treatment or not. Patients continue being followed-up for up to 2 years. Results: As of November 15 2019, 152 patients were included. At the time of sampling, 90.7% had received ≥2 different chemotherapy regimens and other therapies. Main testing for ALK and ROS-1 was IHC in 91.4% and 73.8%, respectively; and for EGFR, it was qPCR in 99.3%. Planned 2nd-line based on routine molecular profile was chemotherapy and, mainly checkpoint inhibitors (61.7%). CGP was assayed on 102 (67.1%) tissue specimens and 50 (32.9%) blood samples. Of the 1,581 GAs identified in 141 patients, 541(34.2%) were potential drivers in 131. The most frequently mutated genes were TP53 in 72(55%) patients and KRAS in 52(40%). TMB and MSI signatures were calculated on 82 patients. 21% had < = 16 mut/Mb. Other GAs of interest are presented in table. Therapeutic orientations were recommended for 116/152(76.8%) patients. In 39/151(25.8%) patients the GAs had approved drugs in NSCLC or other tumor types. CGP outcomes, would be used by 27% of oncologists to guide targeted 2nd-line. Conclusions: CGP detected mutations that are informative for choosing personalized treatment in 25%. CGP demonstrates the ability of detect druggable genomic alterations missed at diagnosis opening new treatment options. [Table: see text]

Details

ISSN :
15277755 and 0732183X
Volume :
38
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........032dd57cd0e963fbdef28989f5653759
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e21555