Back to Search
Start Over
How should metrology bodies treat method-defined measurands?
- Source :
- Accreditation and Quality Assurance. 25:161-166
- Publication Year :
- 2020
- Publisher :
- Springer Science and Business Media LLC, 2020.
-
Abstract
- This discussion article explores how metrology bodies should approach method-defined measurands (also called operationally defined measurands). It begins by considering the different types of measurement that can be encountered and comparing their difference qualities, before discussing in more detail method-defined measurands and the nature of their current and future treatment by the global metrology system. The discussion highlights work performed within the Consultative Committee for Amount of Substance to address what should be within the scope of the International Committee for Weights and Measures Mutual Recognition Arrangement (CIPM-MRA) when method-defined measurands are considered and also how the metrology community can contribute to ensuring stability and comparability of these measurements outside the formal scope of the CIPM-MRA.
- Subjects :
- Scope (project management)
Computer science
General Chemical Engineering
010401 analytical chemistry
Comparability
General Chemistry
Amount of substance
01 natural sciences
0104 chemical sciences
Metrology
010309 optics
Units of measurement
0103 physical sciences
Systems engineering
Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality
Mutual recognition
Instrumentation
Subjects
Details
- ISSN :
- 14320517 and 09491775
- Volume :
- 25
- Database :
- OpenAIRE
- Journal :
- Accreditation and Quality Assurance
- Accession number :
- edsair.doi...........01e47e159168670a4077c5b9a7cdd561
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-020-01424-w