Back to Search Start Over

Sigh in Patients With Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure and ARDS

Authors :
Tommaso Mauri
Giuseppe Foti
Carla Fornari
Giacomo Grasselli
Riccardo Pinciroli
Federica Lovisari
Daniela Tubiolo
Carlo Alberto Volta
Savino Spadaro
Roberto Rona
Egle Rondelli
Paolo Navalesi
Eugenio Garofalo
Rihard Knafelj
Vojka Gorjup
Riccardo Colombo
Andrea Cortegiani
Jian-Xin Zhou
Rocco D’Andrea
Italo Calamai
Ánxela Vidal González
Oriol Roca
Domenico Luca Grieco
Tomas Jovaisa
Dimitrios Bampalis
Tobias Becher
Denise Battaglini
Huiqing Ge
Mariana Luz
Jean-Michel Constantin
Marco Ranieri
Claude Guerin
Jordi Mancebo
Paolo Pelosi
Roberto Fumagalli
Laurent Brochard
Antonio Pesenti
null Plug working group of ESICM
Alessandra Papoff
Raffaele Di Fenza
Stefano Gianni
Elena Spinelli
Alfredo Lissoni
Chiara Abbruzzese
Alfio Bronco
Silvia Villa
Vincenzo Russotto
Arianna Iachi
Lorenzo Ball
Nicolò Patroniti
Rosario Spina
Romano Giuntini
Simone Peruzzi
Luca Salvatore Menga
Tommaso Fossali
Antonio Castelli
Davide Ottolina
Marina García-de-Acilu
Manel Santafè
Dirk Schädler
Norbert Weiler
Emilia Rosas Carvajal
César Pérez Calvo
Evangelia Neou
Yu-Mei Wang
Yi-Min Zhou
Federico Longhini
Andrea Bruni
Mariacristina Leonardi
Cesare Gregoretti
Mariachiara Ippolito
Zelia Milazzo
Lorenzo Querci
Serena Ranieri
Giulia Insom
Jernej Berden
Marko Noc
Ursa Mikuz
Matteo Arzenton
Marta Lazzeri
Arianna Villa
Bruna Brandão Barreto
Marcos Nogueira Oliveira Rios
Dimitri Gusmao-Flores
Mandeep Phull
Tom Barnes
Hussain Musarat
Sara Conti
Source :
Chest. 159:1426-1436
Publication Year :
2021
Publisher :
Elsevier BV, 2021.

Abstract

Background Sigh is a cyclic brief recruitment maneuver: previous physiologic studies showed that its use could be an interesting addition to pressure support ventilation to improve lung elastance, decrease regional heterogeneity, and increase release of surfactant. Research Question Is the clinical application of sigh during pressure support ventilation (PSV) feasible? Study Design and Methods We conducted a multicenter noninferiority randomized clinical trial on adult intubated patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure or ARDS undergoing PSV. Patients were randomized to the no-sigh group and treated by PSV alone, or to the sigh group, treated by PSV plus sigh (increase in airway pressure to 30 cm H2O for 3 s once per minute) until day 28 or death or successful spontaneous breathing trial. The primary end point of the study was feasibility, assessed as noninferiority (5% tolerance) in the proportion of patients failing assisted ventilation. Secondary outcomes included safety, physiologic parameters in the first week from randomization, 28-day mortality, and ventilator-free days. Results Two-hundred and fifty-eight patients (31% women; median age, 65 [54-75] years) were enrolled. In the sigh group, 23% of patients failed to remain on assisted ventilation vs 30% in the no-sigh group (absolute difference, –7%; 95% CI, –18% to 4%; P = .015 for noninferiority). Adverse events occurred in 12% vs 13% in the sigh vs no-sigh group (P = .852). Oxygenation was improved whereas tidal volume, respiratory rate, and corrected minute ventilation were lower over the first 7 days from randomization in the sigh vs no-sigh group. There was no significant difference in terms of mortality (16% vs 21%; P = .337) and ventilator-free days (22 [7-26] vs 22 [3-25] days; P = .300) for the sigh vs no-sigh group. Interpretation Among hypoxemic intubated ICU patients, application of sigh was feasible and without increased risk. Trial Registry ClinicalTrials.gov ; No.: NCT03201263 ; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov

Details

ISSN :
00123692
Volume :
159
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Chest
Accession number :
edsair.doi...........0198e658db2709032700d4d4626d371a
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.10.079