Back to Search Start Over

Effect of plant extract blends in two rearing densities on growth performances of broiler chickens according to their growth potential

Authors :
Guardia, Sarah
Recoquillay, F.
Juin, Herve
LESSIRE, Michel
Leconte, Maryse
GUILLOT, Jean-François
Gabriel, Irène
Unité de Recherches Avicoles (URA)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)
Phytosynthèse [Mozac]
Partenaires INRAE
Elevage Alternatif et Santé des Monogastriques (UE EASM)
Institut Universitaire de Technologie de Tours (IUT de Tours)
Source :
17th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, 17th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Aug 2009, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. WPSA UK Branch, 2009
Publication Year :
2009
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2009.

Abstract

International audience; In order to understand the action mechanism of non-antibiotic growth promoters on the growth performance of birds and to improve their use, the origin of individual variability response must be determined. For this purpose, the performance of chicken fed with or without plant extract blends were studied according to their growth potential estimated by their body weight at d10. A plant extract blend (EXVa) with an antimicrobial effect was used alone or preceded by another blend (EXVb) whose main effects were antioxidant and immunomodulator. Three experimental dietary treatments were performed (control, Exp1 and Exp2). In the control one, birds were fed on a diet with no growth promoter, in the Exp 1 the control diet was supplemented up to d22 with EXVa and in the Exp2, the control died was supplemented with EXVb from d0 to d10 and then with EXVaThis study was performed at two stocking densities, in 3m2 floor pens, either 12 birds/m² (normal density) or 17 birds/m² (high density). Body weight was recorded until broilers were 39 days old.Data were subjected to analysis of variance with two factors (dietary treatment, stocking density) and the body weight at d10 as co-variate. This analysis showing a significant effect on body weight at d10, three groups, with similar number, were defined according to d10 weight (Light, Medium, and Heavy). For each groups, growth data were subjected to analysis of variance with 2 factors (dietary treatment, stocking density). Significant differences between treatments were determined by Student-Newman-Keuls test (p≤0.05). Non significant differences showing biological differences were also specified (p

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
17th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, 17th European Symposium on Poultry Nutrition, Aug 2009, Edinburgh, United Kingdom. WPSA UK Branch, 2009
Accession number :
edsair.dedup.wf.001..d3f08800913179e12d2c3f161544a028