Back to Search Start Over

Willingness to pay for beef is similar between different consumer groups

Authors :
Bonny, S.P.F.
Hocquette, Jean-François
Pethick, D.W.
Legrand, Isbelle
Wierzbicki, Jerzy
Allen, Paul
Farmer, L.J.
Polkinghorne, Rod
Gardner, G.E.
School of Veterinary and Life Sciences
Murdoch University
Unité Mixte de Recherche sur les Herbivores - UMR 1213 (UMRH)
Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement
Service Qualité des Viandes
Institut de l'élevage (IDELE)
Polish Beef Association
Teagasc Agriculture and Food Development Authority (Teagasc)
Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute
Polkinghornes
ProdInra, Migration
VetAgro Sup - Institut national d'enseignement supérieur et de recherche en alimentation, santé animale, sciences agronomiques et de l'environnement (VAS)-Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA)-AgroSup Dijon - Institut National Supérieur des Sciences Agronomiques, de l'Alimentation et de l'Environnement
Source :
67. Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production (EAAP), 67. Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production (EAAP), Aug 2016, Belfast, United Kingdom
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2016.

Abstract

International audience; Quantifying consumer willingness to pay for beef will enhance the development of beef quality systems globally. Over 19,000 consumers from Northern Ireland, Poland, France and Australia participated in a sensory panel where they allocated beef samples to one of four categories: unsatisfactory, good-every-day, betterthan- every-day or premium quality. Consumers were then asked to detail their willingness to pay for these four categories, and complete a short demographic questionnaire which recorded their age, income bracket, occupation, gender, composition of the household and their attitude towards beef. Consumer willingness to pay for beef of different quality levels was found to be remarkably consistent between different demographic groups. Consumers were willing to pay between 150-200% more for premium beef and there was a 50% penalty in value for unsatisfactory beef. By far, the greatest influence of willingness to pay was country of origin. This difference was unable to be explained by the other demographic factors examined in this study, such as occupation, gender, frequency of consumption and the importance of beef in the diet. Consumer age had a small negative relationship with willingness to pay and the importance of meat in the diet had a small positive effect. Therefore, we can conclude that the willingness to pay for beef is highly transferrable between different consumer groups.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
67. Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production (EAAP), 67. Annual Meeting of the European Association for Animal Production (EAAP), Aug 2016, Belfast, United Kingdom
Accession number :
edsair.dedup.wf.001..cd98066d799db3edf94142a25fbbb34a