Back to Search Start Over

The Covariant Phase Space of Gravity with Boundaries

Authors :
Varo, Valle
Varo García, María del Valle
Sánchez Villaseñor, Eduardo Jesús
Margalef Bentabol, Juan
Barbero G., J. Fernando
UC3M. Departamento de Matemáticas
Barbero González, Jesús Fernando
Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Departamento de Matemáticas
Source :
e-Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, instname
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

This thesis investigates the metric and tetrad formulations of three gravitational field theories in manifolds with timelike boundaries within the covariant phase space program. With the recently developed relative bicomplex framework, we explore the space of solutions and presymplectic structures associated with each action principle and analyse their equivalence. The first action we consider is the Einstein-Hilbert (EH) action with the Gibbons- Hawking-York boundary term. By including the appropriate boundary terms in the variational principles, we show that the metric and tetrad formulations derived from them are equivalent. Furthermore, we show that their solution spaces are the same and that their presymplectic structures and associated charges coincide. The second action we consider is the Palatini action with the Obukhov boundary term, assuming torsion and non-metricity, and we prove the equivalence between its metric and tetrad formulations. Furthermore, we show that the metric and tetradsector of the first-order Palatini formulation are equivalent to the metric and tetrad formulations of the EH action. Lastly, we introduce the Hojman-Mukku-Sayed (HMS) action, a generalisation of the Palatini action plus the Holst term in the presence of boundaries with non-metricity and torsion. We prove that the space of solutions of the HMS and Palatini actions coincided and conclude that HMS’s metric and tetrad sectors are identical to their corresponding versions of the EH action. Additionally, we prove that the Palatini and HMS Lagrangians are not cohomologically equal despite defining the same space of solutions. Consequently, a careful analysis is required for the presymplectic structures and the charges because they may differ. However, we show that the covariant phase spaces of both theories were equivalent. This sheds light on some open problems regarding the equivalence of their associated charges in different formulations. Programa de Doctorado en Ingeniería Matemática por la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid Presidente: José Navarro Salas.- Secretario: Bogar Díaz Jiménez.- Vocal: Mercedes Martín Benito

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
e-Archivo. Repositorio Institucional de la Universidad Carlos III de Madrid, instname
Accession number :
edsair.dedup.wf.001..8f8e624438d3a1259c55297a7ae5f29d