Back to Search Start Over

Assessing 5 years of GOSAT Proxy XCH4 data and associated uncertainties

Authors :
Parker, R. J.
Boesch, H.
Byckling, K.
Webb, A. J.
Palmer, P. I.
Feng, L.
Bergamaschi, P.
Chevallier, F.
Notholt, J.
Deutscher, N.
Warneke, T.
Hase, F.
Sussmann, R.
Kawakami, S.
Kivi, R.
Griffith, D. W. T.
Velazco, V.
University of Leicester
School of Geosciences [Edinburgh]
University of Edinburgh
Laboratoire Géomatériaux et Environnement (LGE)
Université Paris-Est Marne-la-Vallée (UPEM)
JRC Institute for Environment and Sustainability (IES)
European Commission - Joint Research Centre [Ispra] (JRC)
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement [Gif-sur-Yvette] (LSCE)
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)
Modélisation INVerse pour les mesures atmosphériques et SATellitaires (SATINV)
Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)
Institut für Umweltphysik [Bremen] (IUP)
Universität Bremen
Institute of Environmental Physics [Bremen] (IUP)
University of Bremen
Institute for Meteorology and Climate Research (IMK)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)
Institut für Meteorologie und Klimaforschung - Atmosphärische Umweltforschung (IMK-IFU)
Karlsruher Institut für Technologie (KIT)
Finnish Meteorological Institute (FMI)
School of Chemistry
NE/K002465/1, Natural Environment Research Council
283576, Seventh Framework Programme
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université de Versailles Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines (UVSQ)-Commissariat à l'énergie atomique et aux énergies alternatives (CEA)-Institut national des sciences de l'Univers (INSU - CNRS)-Université Paris-Saclay-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
Source :
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Vol 8, Iss 11, Pp 4785-4801 (2015), Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, European Geosciences Union, 2015, 8 (11), pp.4785-4801. ⟨10.5194/amt-8-4785-2015⟩, Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, 2015, 8 (11), pp.4785-4801. ⟨10.5194/amt-8-4785-2015⟩, Parker, R J, Boesch, H, Byckling, K, Webb, A J, Palmer, P I, Feng, L, Bergamaschi, P, Chevallier, F, Notholt, J, Deutscher, N, Warneke, T, Hase, F, Sussmann, R, Kawakami, S, Kivi, R, Griffith, D W T & Velazco, V 2015, ' Assessing 5 years of GOSAT Proxy XCH 4 data and associated uncertainties ', Atmospheric Measurement Techniques, vol. 8, no. 11, pp. 4785-4801 . https://doi.org/10.5194/amt-8-4785-2015
Publication Year :
2015
Publisher :
Copernicus Publications, 2015.

Abstract

We present 5 years of GOSAT XCH4 retrieved using the "proxy" approach. The Proxy XCH4 data are validated against ground-based TCCON observations and are found to be of high quality with a small bias of 4.8 ppb (∼ 0.27 %) and a single-sounding precision of 13.4 ppb (∼ 0.74 %). The station-to-station bias (ameasure of the relative accuracy) is found to be 4.2 ppb. For the first time the XCH4 / XCO2 ratio component of the Proxy retrieval is validated (bias of 0.014 ppb ppm−1 (∼ 0.30 %), single-sounding precision of 0.033 ppb ppm−1 (∼ 0.72 %)). The uncertainty relating to the model XCO2 component of the Proxy XCH4 is assessed through the use of an ensemble of XCO2 models. While each individual XCO2 model is found to agree well with the TCCON validation data (r = 0.94–0.97), it is not possible to select one model as the best from our comparisons. The median XCO2 value of the ensemble has a smaller scatter against TCCON (a standard deviation of 0.92 ppm) than any of the individual models whilst maintaining a small bias (0.15 ppm). This model median XCO2 is used to calculate the Proxy XCH4 with the maximum deviation of the ensemble from the median used as an estimate of the uncertainty. We compare this uncertainty to the a posteriori retrieval error (which is assumed to reduce with sqrt(N)) and find typically that the model XCO2 uncertainty becomes significant during summer months when the a posteriori error is at its lowest due to the increase in signal related to increased summertime reflected sunlight. We assess the significance of these model and retrieval uncertainties on flux inversion by comparing the GOSAT XCH4 against modelled XCH4 from TM5-4DVAR constrained by NOAA surface observations (MACC reanalysis scenario S1-NOAA). We find that for the majority of regions the differences are much larger than the estimated uncertainties. Our findings show that useful information will be provided to the inversions for the majority of regions in addition to that already provided by the assimilated surface measurements.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18678548 and 18671381
Volume :
8
Issue :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Accession number :
edsair.dedup.wf.001..77cf4ccc0fab93b221415fe48c85b86c