Back to Search Start Over

Early career researchers: Scholarly behaviour and the prospect of change

Authors :
Nicholas, David
Watkinson, Anthony
Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Chérifa
Rodríguez-Bravo, Blanca
Xu, Jie
Abrizah, Abdullah
Świgoń, Marzena
Herman, Eti
CIBER Research
CIBER Research Ltd
Equipe de recherche de Lyon en sciences de l'information et de la communication (ELICO)
Sciences Po Lyon - Institut d'études politiques de Lyon (IEP Lyon)
Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-École nationale supérieure des sciences de l'information et des bibliothèques (ENSSIB)
Université de Lyon-Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (UCBL)
Université de Lyon-Université Jean Moulin - Lyon 3 (UJML)
Université de Lyon-Université Lumière - Lyon 2 (UL2)
Universidad de León [León]
Shanghai Jiao Tong University [Shanghai]
PRC
Université Lumière - Lyon 2 (UL2)-École nationale supérieure des sciences de l'information et des bibliothèques (ENSSIB)
Université de Lyon-Université de Lyon-Sciences Po Lyon - Institut d'études politiques de Lyon (IEP Lyon)
Université de Lyon
Source :
Learned Publishing, Learned Publishing, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, 2017, 30 (2), pp.157-166. ⟨10.1002/leap.1098⟩, Learned Publishing, 2017, 30 (2), pp.157-166. ⟨10.1002/leap.1098⟩
Publication Year :
2017
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2017.

Abstract

International audience; Early career researchers (ECRs) are of great interest because they are the new (and biggest) wave of researchers. They merit long and detailed investigation, and towards this end, this overarching paper provides a summary of the first‐year findings of a 3‐year, longitudinal study of 116 science and social science ECRs who have published nearly 1,200 papers and come from 7 countries and 81 universities. ECRs were interviewed in their own languages face‐to‐face, by Skype, or telephone. The study focused on the attitudes and behaviours of ECRs with respect to scholarly communications and the extent to which they are adopting new and disruptive technologies, such as social media, online communities, and Open Science. The main findings include: publishing in high‐impact factor journals is the only reputational game in town; online scholarly communities, and ResearchGate in particular, are gaining ground; social media are beginning to have an impact, especially in the dissemination arena; outreach activities have become more important; libraries are becoming increasingly invisible to ECRs; Open Science is not gaining traction; and more transformational ideas are being expressed, especially in the US and UK.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09531513
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Learned Publishing, Learned Publishing, Association of Learned and Professional Society Publishers, 2017, 30 (2), pp.157-166. ⟨10.1002/leap.1098⟩, Learned Publishing, 2017, 30 (2), pp.157-166. ⟨10.1002/leap.1098⟩
Accession number :
edsair.dedup.wf.001..6155ecde1bed5773ccec4884862fecd1