Back to Search Start Over

On the effect of using different phrasings in proving tasks

Authors :
Kempen, Leander
Tebaartz, Petra
Krieger, Miriam
University of Paderborn
University of Gießen
Joseph-König-Gymnasium, Haltern am See
Utrecht University
Uffe Thomas Jankvist
Marja van den Heuvel-Panhuizen
Michiel Veldhuis
Veldhuis, Michiel
Source :
CERME11, Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Utrecht University, Feb 2019, Utrecht, Netherlands, www.cerme11.org
Publication Year :
2019
Publisher :
HAL CCSD, 2019.

Abstract

International audience; The research presented in this paper is about the question, if and how the phrasing of a proving task influences students’ proof productions. In our study, 381 first-year preservice teachers were asked to work on a proof questionnaire involving two proving tasks, where the phrasings “prove that”, “show that”, “reason”, and “explain” were used alternatively. Students’ proof productions were analyzed concerning the kind of reasoning, the use of algebraic variables and the number of words used. While we found statistically significant differences in the proof productions for the easier first task, there were no remarkable differences in the case of the harder second task.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
CERME11, Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Utrecht University, Feb 2019, Utrecht, Netherlands, www.cerme11.org
Accession number :
edsair.dedup.wf.001..0b32e14b2ed49936eab7755e55bb2892