Geographic indications and rural development: implications for TTIP negotiations

Authors :: Petit, M.
Ilbert, H.
Adamolle, Cécile
Arfini F. (ed.), Mancini M.C. (ed.), Veneziani M. (ed.), Donati M. (ed.)
Centre International de Hautes Etudes Agronomiques Méditerranéennes - Institut Agronomique Méditerranéen de Montpellier (CIHEAM-IAMM)
Centre International de Hautes Études Agronomiques Méditerranéennes (CIHEAM)
Arfini F. (ed.)
Mancini M.C. (ed.)
Veneziani M. (ed.)
Donati M. (ed.)
Chercheur Nord
Source :: Intellectual property rights for geographical indications: what is at stake in the TTIP?, Arfini F. (ed.), Mancini M.C. (ed.), Veneziani M. (ed.), Donati M. (ed.). Intellectual property rights for geographical indications: what is at stake in the TTIP?, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp.211-229, 2016
Publication Year :: 2016
Publisher :: HAL CCSD, 2016.
Abstract: International audience; In an earlier paper, we interpreted the resolution of the 2005 WTO dispute on GIs as a stalemate and suggested a shift of the balance of power in favor of the pro-GI coalition. Since then, international negotiations continue to be stalled. The record of GIs as a tool for the promotion of rural development shows that few non-European GIs have been registered. The case of Morocco illustrates the difficulties faced by a government eager to use GIs as a development instrument. International recognition of GIs is difficult. The TTIP might not resolve institutional and doctrinal GI problems.

Language :: English
Database :: OpenAIRE
Journal :: Intellectual property rights for geographical indications: what is at stake in the TTIP?, Arfini F. (ed.), Mancini M.C. (ed.), Veneziani M. (ed.), Donati M. (ed.). Intellectual property rights for geographical indications: what is at stake in the TTIP?, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, pp.211-229, 2016
Accession number :: edsair.dedup.wf.001..048f0ef88475a3e5741f0a6ba5a7491e

Tools