Back to Search Start Over

Cryoballoon or Radiofrequency Ablation for Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Authors :
Kuck, Karl-Heinz
Brugada, Josep
Fürnkranz, Alexander
Metzner, Andreas
Ouyang, Feifan
Chun, KR Julian
Elvan, Arif
Arentz, Thomas
Bestehorn, Kurt
Pocock, Stuart J
Albenque, Jean-Paul
Tondo, Claudio
FIRE AND ICE Investigators
Publication Year :
2016
Publisher :
Massachusetts Medical Society, 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines recommend pulmonary-vein isolation by means of catheter ablation as treatment for drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency ablation is the most common method, and cryoballoon ablation is the second most frequently used technology. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, randomized trial to determine whether cryoballoon ablation was noninferior to radiofrequency ablation in symptomatic patients with drug-refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. The primary efficacy end point in a time-to-event analysis was the first documented clinical failure (recurrence of atrial fibrillation, occurrence of atrial flutter or atrial tachycardia, use of antiarrhythmic drugs, or repeat ablation) following a 90-day period after the index ablation. The noninferiority margin was prespecified as a hazard ratio of 1.43. The primary safety end point was a composite of death, cerebrovascular events, or serious treatment-related adverse events. RESULTS: A total of 762 patients underwent randomization (378 assigned to cryoballoon ablation and 384 assigned to radiofrequency ablation). The mean duration of follow-up was 1.5 years. The primary efficacy end point occurred in 138 patients in the cryoballoon group and in 143 in the radiofrequency group (1-year Kaplan-Meier event rate estimates, 34.6% and 35.9%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76 to 1.22; P

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00284793
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.core.ac.uk....e3d919a4427b5b6491e5f9cc1b670a3b