Back to Search Start Over

Long-Term Clinical Impact of Coronary CT Angiography in Patients With Recent Acute-Onset Chest Pain The Randomized Controlled CATCH Trial

Authors :
Linde, Jesper J.
Hove, Jens D.
Sørgaard, Mathias
Kelbæk, Henning
Jensen, Gorm B.
Kühl, Jørgen T.
Hindsø, Louise
Køber, Lars
Nielsen, Walter B.
Kofoed, Klaus F.
Source :
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging. (12):1404-1413
Publisher :
American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Abstract

ObjectivesThe aim of the CATCH (CArdiac cT in the treatment of acute CHest pain) trial was to investigate the long-term clinical impact of a coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA)-guided treatment strategy in patients with recent acute-onset chest pain compared to standard care.BackgroundThe prognostic implications of a coronary CTA-guided treatment strategy have not been compared in a randomized fashion to standard care in patients referred for acute-onset chest pain.MethodsPatients with acute chest pain but normal electrocardiograms and troponin values were randomized to treatment guided by either coronary CTA or standard care (bicycle exercise electrocardiogram or myocardial perfusion imaging). In the coronary CTA-guided group, a functional test was included in cases of nondiagnostic coronary CTA images or coronary stenoses of borderline severity. The primary endpoint was a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction (MI), hospitalization for unstable angina pectoris (UAP), late symptom-driven revascularizations, and readmission for chest pain.ResultsWe randomized 299 patients to coronary CTA-guided strategy and 301 to standard care. After inclusion, 24 patients withdrew their consent. The median (interquartile range) follow-up duration was 18.7 (range 16.8 to 20.1) months. In the coronary CTA-guided group, 30 patients (11%) had a primary endpoint versus 47 patients (16%) in the standard care group (p = 0.04; hazard ratio [HR]: 0.62 [95% confidence interval: 0.40 to 0.98]). A major adverse cardiac event (cardiac death, MI, hospitalization for UAP, and late symptom-driven revascularization) was observed in 5 patients (2 MIs, 3 UAPs) in the coronary CTA-guided group versus 14 patients (1 cardiac death, 7 MIs, 5 UAPs, 1 late symptom-driven revascularization) in the standard care group (p = 0.04; HR: 0.36 [95% CI: 0.16 to 0.95]). Differences in cardiac death and MI (8 vs. 2) were insignificant (p = 0.06).ConclusionsA coronary CTA-guided treatment strategy appears to improve clinical outcome in patients with recent acute-onset chest pain and normal electrocardiograms and troponin values compared to standard care with a functional test. (Cardiac-CT in the Treatment of Acute Chest Pain [CATCH]; NCT01534000)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1936878X
Issue :
12
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
JACC: Cardiovascular Imaging
Accession number :
edsair.core.ac.uk....c0dd453ea189997f1996879717afec7e
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmg.2015.07.015