Back to Search Start Over

The aquaculture supply chain in the time of covid- 19 pandemic: Vulnerability, resilience, solutions and priorities at the global scale

Authors :
Mangano, Maria, Cristina
Berlino, Manuel
Corbari, Laura
Milisenda, Giacomo
Lucchese, Marta
Terzo, Stella
Bosh-Belmar, Mar
Azaza, Mohamed, Salah
Babarro, Jose, M, F
Bakiu, Rigers
Broitman, Bernardo, R
Buschmann, Alejandro
Christofoletti, Ronaldo
Dong, Yunwei
Glamuzina, Branko
Luthman, Ola
Makridis, Pavlos
Nogueira, Antonio
Palomo, Maria, Gabriela
Dineshram, Ramadoss
Sanchez-Jerez, Pablo
Sevgili, Hüseyin
Troell, Max
AbouelFadl, Khaled
Azra, Mohamad, N
Britz, Peter
Carrington, Emily
Celić, Igor
Choi, Francis
Qin, Chuanxin
Dionísio, M, A
Dobroslavić, Tatjana
Galli, Paolo
Giannetto, Daniela
Grabowski, Jonathan
Helmuth, Brian
Lebata-Ramos, Ma, Junemie, Hazel
Lim, Po, Teen
Liu. Yajie
Martínez-Llorens, Silvia
Mirto, Simone
Pećarević, Marijana
Pita, Cristina
Ragg, Norman
Ravagnan, Elisa
Saidi, Djamal
Schultz, Keith
Shaltout, Mohamed
Tan, Shau, Hwai
Thiyagarajan, Vengatesen
Sara', Gianluca
Publication Year :
2022

Abstract

The COVID-19 global pandemic has had severe, unpredictable and synchronous impacts on all levels of perishable food supply chains (PFSC), across multiple sectors and spatial scales. Aquaculture plays a vital and rapidly expanding role in food security, in some cases overtaking wild caught fisheries in the production of high- quality animal protein in this PFSC. We performed a rapid global assessment to evaluate the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and related emerging control measures on the aquaculture supply chain. Socio-economic effects of the pandemic were analysed by surveying the perceptions of stakeholders, who were asked to describe potential supply-side disruption, vulnerabilities and resilience patterns along the production pipeline with four main supply chain components: a) hatchery, b) production/processing, c) distribution/logistics and d) market. We also assessed different farming strategies, comparing land- vs. sea-based systems ; extensive vs. intensive methods ; and with and without integrated multi-trophic aquaculture, IMTA. In addition to evaluating levels and sources of economic distress, interviewees were asked to identify mitigation solutions adopted at local / internal (i.e., farm-site) scales, and to express their preference on national / external scale mitigation measures among a set of a priori options. Survey responses identified the potential causes of disruption, ripple effects, sources of food insecurity, and socio-economic conflicts. They also pointed to various levels of mitigation strategies. The collated evidence represents a first baseline useful to address future disaster- driven responses, to reinforce the resilience of the sector and to facilitate the design reconstruction plans and mitigation measures, such as financial aid strategies.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.57a035e5b1ae..4a9f9c337640ef17e7ec02b904405105
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2021.10.014.