Back to Search
Start Over
Effect of modulators of hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction on the response to inhaled nitric oxide in a neonatal model of severe pulmonary atelectasis
- Source :
- Seminars in Perinatology; June 1996, Vol. 20 Issue: 3 p186-193, 8p
- Publication Year :
- 1996
-
Abstract
- Hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction (HPV) is an intrinsic mechanism that facilitates ventilation to perfusion matching and preservation of oxygenation. We investigated the neonatal HPV response from extensive atelectasis and tested the hypothesis that (1) the resulting hypoxemia is corrected by inhaled nitric oxide (NO); (2) the ''pulmonary steal'' of blood away from hypoxic area is further improved by modulators of the HPV. Intratracheal injection of steel beads in 32 piglets (7 to 20 days) resulted in atelectasis of 50% to 75% of the lungs. The piglets were then randomized to receive saline (control), indomethacin (IND) 2 mg/kg, doxapram (DOX) 0.5 mg/kg/h or almitrine (ALM) 4 @mg/kg/min. After 30 minutes, all animals were subjected to NO at 40 ppm. Atelectasis resulted in severe impairment in oxygenation (PaO"2 - 105+/-6 mm Hg, AaDO"2=536+/-9 mm Hg; shunt fraction = 31%+/-2%) and moderate pulmonary hypertension. Mean pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) increased to 35+/-0.8 mm Hg. NO reduced pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) from 128 +/-14 mm Hg/kg/mL/min to 74+/-9 mm Hg/kg/mL/min and improved gas exchange (PaO"2=180 +/-50 and AaDO"2=438+/-50 mm Hg). Following the development of atelectasis, the peripheral chemoreceptor agonists (ALM and DOX) did not modify gas exchange and had no significant cardiovascular effect. ALM and DOX failed to enhance the response to NO. IND did not alter HPV, but prevented the improvement in gas exchange associated with NO-induced pulmonary vasodilation.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 01460005
- Volume :
- 20
- Issue :
- 3
- Database :
- Supplemental Index
- Journal :
- Seminars in Perinatology
- Publication Type :
- Periodical
- Accession number :
- ejs9418652
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/S0146-0005(96)80047-4