Back to Search Start Over

Clonazepam repurposing in ARID1Bpatients through conventional RCT and N-of-1 trials: an experimental strategy for orphan disease development

Authors :
van der Sluijs, Pleuntje J
Safai Pour, Koshar
Berends, Cécile L
Kruizinga, Matthijs D
Mu¨ller, Annelieke R
van Eeghen, Agnies M
Rodríguez-Girondo, Mar
Juachon, Maria J
Steenbeek, Duco
Cohen, Adam F
Zuiker, Rob G J A
Santen, Gijs W E
Source :
Journal of Medical Genetics (JMG); 2025, Vol. 62 Issue: 3 p210-218, 9p
Publication Year :
2025

Abstract

BackgroundClinical trials for rare disorders have unique challenges due to low prevalence, patient phenotype variability and high expectations. These challenges are highlighted by our study on clonazepam in ARID1Bpatients, a common cause of intellectual disability. Previous studies on Arid1b-haploinsufficient mice showed positive effects of clonazepam on various cognitive aspects.MethodsThis study used a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, two-way crossover study (RCT), followed by an N-of-1 design. In the crossover study, ARID1Bpatients received clonazepam (max 0.5 mg, two times per day) or a placebo for 22 days with a 3-week washout period. Assessments included safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics on neurocognitive tasks, behaviour and cognitive function. During phase I of the N-of-1 trial the optimal dosage and individual treatment goals were determined. Phase II evaluated the treatment effect. This phase was composed of three periods: an open-label period with placebo (4 weeks), followed by a double-blinded period (6 weeks), followed by an open-label period in which the patient received clonazepam (4 weeks).ResultsIn the clonazepam group (n=16, 15 completing both periods), seven (44%) reported improvement on Clinician Global Impression of Improvement versus two (13%) on placebo. 13 (87%) showed ‘no change’ after placebo (two (13%) on clonazepam), while seven (44%) on clonazepam reported deterioration, often linked to side effects (n=6), suggesting potential benefit from lower dosing. Three N-of-1 trials with RCT responders saw two patients improve on clonazepam during double-blinding, but clinical evaluation deemed the improvements insufficient.ConclusionsOur approach shows the feasibility and strength of combining conventional RCT and N-of-1 studies for therapeutic studies in populations with intellectual disabilities, distinguishing real treatment effects from expectation bias. Our findings suggest that clonazepam has no additional therapeutic value in ARID1Bpatients.Trial registration numberEUCTR2019-003558-98, ISRCTN11225608.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00222593 and 14686244
Volume :
62
Issue :
3
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Journal of Medical Genetics (JMG)
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs69155741
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/jmg-2024-109951