Back to Search
Start Over
Priority setting: Development of the South Australian Aboriginal Chronic Disease Consortium RoadMapfor Action
- Source :
- Health Promotion Journal of Australia; October 2024, Vol. 35 Issue: 4 p1274-1284, 11p
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Aboriginal) people in South Australia are overburdened by cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cancer. The South Australian Aboriginal Chronic Disease Consortium (Consortium) was established in June 2017 as a collaborative partnership to lead the implementation of three state‐wide chronic disease plans using a strategic approach to identifying key priority areas for action. In 2017–2018, the Consortium Coordinating Centre facilitated a priority setting process, which involved extensive consultation, including a prioritisation survey and stakeholder workshops. The Consortium's Aboriginal Community Reference Group was instrumental in leading the identification of priorities for action. The Consortium RoadMap for Action identified seven across‐plan priorities and six condition‐specific priorities. It acknowledged that: strengthening social and emotional well‐being is central to improving health outcomes; prevention and early detection, acute management and ongoing management are all components of the continuum of care; and improving access to services, strengthening the workforce, and monitoring and evaluation are required across the continuum of care. Widespread implementation failure in the past across the health system and health services implementation and research translation highlights the value of the Consortium approach and its commitment to implementing the state‐wide chronic disease plans in a collaborative manner. The Consortium relies on and fosters cross‐sectoral alignment, with all key players including all public, private and Aboriginal Community Controlled health services, to progress its priorities and aspirations to improve health outcomes for Aboriginal people using evidence‐based strategies. Rigorous and transparent priority setting processes that bring together research, clinical practice, health services operations, policy and community perspectives can foster intersectoral collaboration and partnership and support the implementation of shared priorities.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 10361073 and 22011617
- Volume :
- 35
- Issue :
- 4
- Database :
- Supplemental Index
- Journal :
- Health Promotion Journal of Australia
- Publication Type :
- Periodical
- Accession number :
- ejs67775328
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1002/hpja.864