Back to Search Start Over

Open versus robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair: outcomes of the ORREO prospective randomized controlled trial

Authors :
Warren, Jeremy A.
Blackhurst, Dawn
Ewing, Joseph A.
Carbonell, Alfredo M.
Source :
Surgical Endoscopy; 20240101, Issue: Preprints p1-9, 9p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Background: Robotic retromuscular ventral hernia repair (rRMVHR) potentially combines the best features of open and minimally invasive VHR: myofascial release with abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR) with the lower wound morbidity of laparoscopic VHR. Proliferation of this technique has outpaced the data supporting this claim. We report 2-year outcomes of the first randomized controlled trial of oRMVHR vs rRMVHR. Methods: Single-center randomized control trial of open vs rRMVHR. 100 patients were randomized (50 open, 50 robotic). We included patients > 18 y/o with hernias 7–15 cm with at least one of the following: diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30, or current smokers. Primary outcome was occurrence of a composite outcome of surgical site infection (SSI), non-seroma surgical site occurrence (SSO), readmission, or hernia recurrence. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, any SSI or SSO, SSI/SSOPI, operative time, patient reported quality of life, and cost. Analysis was performed in an intention-to-treat fashion. Study was funded by a grant from Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons. Results: 90 patients were available for 30-day and 62 for 2-year analysis (rRMVHR = 46 and 32, oRMVHR = 44 and 30). Hernias in the open group were slightly larger (10 vs 8 cm, p= 0.024) and more likely to have prior mesh (36.4 vs 15.2%; p= 0.030), but were similar in length, prior hernia repairs, mesh use, and myofascial release. There was no difference in primary composite outcome between oRMVHR and rRMVHR (20.5 vs 19.6%, p= 1.000). Median length of stay was shorter for rRMVHR (1 vs 2 days; p< 0.001). All patients had significant improvement in quality of life at 1 and 2 years. Other secondary outcomes were similar. Conclusion: There is no difference in a composite outcome including SSI, SSOPI, readmission, and hernia recurrence between open and robotic RMVHR. Graphical abstract: <fig id="Figa" position="anchor"> <graphic position="anchor" specific-use="HTML" mime-subtype="PNG" href="MediaObjects/464_2024_11202_Figa_HTML.png" id="MO1"></graphic> </fig>

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09302794 and 14322218
Issue :
Preprints
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Surgical Endoscopy
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs67388655
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-11202-1