Hangman’s Fracture in Geriatric Population: A Nationwide Multicenter Study in Japan

Study Design Retrospective multicenter study.Objectives To investigate the treatments of the geriatric population with hangman’s fractures using a multicenter database under the Japan Association of Spine Surgeons with Ambition (JASA).Methods The multicenter database included data from 1512 patients. We employed the Levine and Edwards classification for categorizing hangman’s fractures. The study incorporated epidemiological data, including the prevalence of hangman’s fractures, patient age, and follow-up duration. Bony fusion rates and length of hospitalization were recorded for Type I and Type II fractures, and the degree of neurological impairment was assessed.Results Hangman’s fractures represented 62 cases, accounting for 7.4% of all cervical spine injuries. The patients had an average age of 76.6 ± 6.5 years, and the mean duration of follow-up was 21.5 ± 23.6 months. The study found that the bony fusion rate for hangman’s fractures in the geriatric population was 88.9%. Surgical treatment was associated with a shorter hospitalization period for Type II fractures compared to conservative treatment. Thirteen cases of hangman’s fractures in the geriatric population, accounting for 21%, were complicated by spinal cord injury.Conclusions This is the largest study to date on hangman’s fractures in geriatric population ≥65 years. Type I and Type II fractures, according to the Levine and Edwards classification, had a bony fusion rate of up to 90%. In patients with Type II fractures, surgical treatment led to a shorter initial hospital stay. Geriatric patients are at risk of spinal cord injury due to hangman’s fractures.