Back to Search Start Over

Patient-reported effects of hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making at a university medical centre in Germany: a pre–post trial

Authors :
Scheibler, Fu¨lo¨p
Geiger, Friedemann
Wehkamp, Kai
Danner, Marion
Debrouwere, Marie
Stolz-Klingenberg, Constanze
Schuldt-Joswig, Anja
Sommer, Christina Gesine
Kopeleva, Olga
Bu¨nzen, Claudia
Wagner-Ullrich, Christine
Koch, Gerhard
Coors, Marie
Wehking, Felix
Clayman, Marla
Weymayr, Christian
Sundmacher, Leonie
Ru¨ffer, Jens Ulrich
Source :
Evidence-Based Medicine; 2024, Vol. 29 Issue: 2 p87-95, 9p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

ObjectivesTo evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of the SHARE TO CARE (S2C) programme, a complex intervention designed for hospital-wide implementation of shared decision-making (SDM).DesignPre–post study.SettingUniversity Hospital Schleswig-Holstein (UKSH), Kiel Campus.ParticipantsHealthcare professionals as well as inpatients and outpatients from 22 departments of the Kiel Campus of UKSH.InterventionsThe S2C programme is a comprehensive implementation strategy including four core modules: (1) physician training, (2) SDM support training for and support by nurses as decision coaches, (3) patient activation and (4) evidence-based patient decision aid development and integration into patient pathways. After full implementation, departments received the S2C certificate.Main outcome measuresIn this paper, we report on the feasibility and effectiveness outcomes of the implementation. Feasibility was judged by the degree of implementation of the four modules of the programme. Outcome measures for effectiveness are patient-reported experience measures (PREMs). The primary outcome measure for effectiveness is the Patient Decision Making subscale of the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (PICSPDM). Pre–post comparisons were done using t-tests.ResultsThe implementation of the four components of the S2C programme was able to be completed in 18 of the 22 included departments within the time frame of the study. After completion of implementation, PICSPDMshowed a statistically significant difference (p<0.01) between the means compared with baseline. This difference corresponds to a small to medium yet clinically meaningful positive effect (Hedges’ g=0.2). Consistent with this, the secondary PREMs (Preparation for Decision Making and collaboRATE) also showed statistically significant, clinically meaningful positive effects.ConclusionsThe hospital-wide implementation of SDM with the S2C-programme proved to be feasible and effective within the time frame of the project. The German Federal Joint Committee has recommended to make the Kiel model of SDM a national standard of care.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
13565524 and 14736810
Volume :
29
Issue :
2
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Evidence-Based Medicine
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs65819092
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112462