Encounter rates and catch‐and‐releasemortality of steelhead in the Snake River basin

The potential influence (i.e., impact rate) of catch‐and‐release fisheries on wild steelhead Oncorhynchus mykissis poorly understood and is a function of the abundance of wild fish, how many fish are encountered by anglers (i.e., encounter rate), and the mortality of fish that are caught and released. In Idaho, estimates of wild steelhead encounter rates have been derived using the number of wild and hatchery steelhead passing Lower Granite Dam, the number of hatchery steelhead harvested, and the number of hatchery steelhead caught and released. The method includes assumptions that hatchery and wild steelhead have equal encounter rates and catch‐and‐release mortality is 5% for wild steelhead. Here, we investigated wild and hatchery steelhead encounter rates by anglers, estimated catch‐and‐release mortality, and concatenated both aspects to examine how existing recreational steelhead fisheries influence wild steelhead mortality. We sampled, tagged, and released 1,251 spawn‐year 2020 (SY2020) and 1,956 spawn‐year 2021 (SY2021) adult steelhead at Lower Granite Dam with T‐bar anchor tags and passive integrated transponder (PIT) tags to estimate steelhead encounter rates and catch‐and‐release mortality. Differences in survival of caught steelhead and those not reported as caught were evaluated using detections at various locations (e.g., PIT arrays, weirs). Estimated encounter rates were 43.7% (95% credible interval; 28.2%, 100.0%) for wild fish and 46.7% (29.6%, 100.0%) for adipose‐clipped fish in SY2020. In SY2021, encounter rates were 47.2% (32.4%, 100.0%) for wild fish and 52.3% (37.1%, 100.0%) for adipose‐clipped fish. Based on detections of caught fish and those not reported as caught, catch‐and‐release mortality of wild steelhead was estimated to be 1.6% (0.0%, 5.2%). Wild steelhead impact rates were 0.7% (0.0%, 2.7%) in SY2020 and 0.7% (0.0%, 2.8%) in SY2021. Estimated rates of impact on wild steelhead were consistent and low across years despite major differences in the structure of the fisheries. Our results suggest assuming that encounter rates are equal between hatchery and wild steelhead, and that steelhead catch‐and‐release mortality is 5%, will likely lead to a conservative estimate of the wild steelhead impact occurring from catch‐and‐release fisheries. Impact statementWith wild steelhead numbers declining in many parts of North America, a dilemma between providing angling opportunity and wild steelhead conservation can develop. We show that encounter rate plays a larger role than mortality regarding catch‐and‐release angling on overall impact rates. Our method provides a direct, reliable estimate of encounter rates across multiple scales. With wild steelhead numbers declining in many parts of North America, a dilemma between providing angling opportunity and wild steelhead conservation can develop. We show that encounter rate plays a larger role than mortality regarding catch‐and‐release angling on overall impact rates. Our method provides a direct, reliable estimate of encounter rates across multiple scales.