Back to Search Start Over

The First Hybrid International Educational Comprehensive Cleft Care Workshop

Authors :
Kantar, Rami S.
Esenlik, Elçin
Al Abyad, Omar S.
Melhem, Antonio
Younan, Robert A.
Haddad, Mario
Keith, Kristen
Kassam, Serena
Annan, Beyhan
Vijayakumar, Charanya
Picard, Arnaud
Padwa, Bonnie L.
Sommerlad, Brian
Raposo-Amaral, Cassio Eduardo
Forrest, Christopher R.
Gillett, David A.
Steinbacher, Derek M.
Runyan, Christopher M.
Tanikawa, Daniela Y. S.
Chong, David K.
Fisher, David M.
Mark, Hans
Canter, Halil Ibrahim
Losee, Joseph E.
Patel, Krishna G.
Hartzell, Larry D.
Johnson, Adam B.
Collares, Marcus Vinícius Martins
Alonso, Nivaldo
Chen, Philip Kuo-Ting
Tse, Raymond
Mann, Robert J.
Prada-Madrid, Jose Rolando
Kobayashi, Shinji
Hussain, Syed Altaf
Kummer, Ann
Sell, Debbie A.
Pereira, Valerie J.
Mabry, Kelly
Gonsoulin, Courtney K.
Persson, Martin
Davies, Gareth
Sethna, Navil F.
Munoz-Pareja, Jennifer C.
Kuijpers-Jagtman, Anne Marie
Grayson, Barry H.
Grollemund, Bruno
Garib, Daniela G.
Meazzini, Maria Costanza
Kharbanda, Om P.
Santiago, Pedro E.
Nalabothu, Prasad
Batra, Puneet
Stieber, Erin
Prasad, Dushyant
Brewster, Hugh
Ayala, Ruben
Erbay, Elif
Akcam, M. Okan
Don Griot, J. Peter W.
Vyas, Raj M.
Flores, Roberto L
Breugem, Corstiaan C.
Hamdan, Usama S.
Source :
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal; October 2023, Vol. 60 Issue: 10 p1189-1198, 10p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Objective Describe the first hybrid global simulation-based comprehensive cleft care workshop, evaluate impact on participants, and compare experiences based on in-person versus virtual attendance.Design Cross-sectional survey-based evaluation.Setting International comprehensive cleft care workshop.Participants Total of 489 participants.Interventions Three-day simulation-based hybrid comprehensive cleft care workshop.Main Outcome Measures Participant demographic data, perceived barriers and interventions needed for global comprehensive cleft care delivery, participant workshop satisfaction, and perceived short-term impact on practice stratified by in-person versus virtual attendance.Results The workshop included 489 participants from 5 continents. The response rate was 39.9%. Participants perceived financial factors (30.3%) the most significant barrier and improvement in training (39.8%) as the most important intervention to overcome barriers facing cleft care delivery in low to middle-income countries. All participants reported a high level of satisfaction with the workshop and a strong positive perceived short-term impact on their practice. Importantly, while this was true for both in-person and virtual attendees, in-person attendees reported a significantly higher satisfaction with the workshop (28.63 ± 3.08 vs 27.63 ± 3.93; P= .04) and perceived impact on their clinical practice (22.37 ± 3.42 vs 21.02 ± 3.45 P= .01).Conclusion Hybrid simulation-based educational comprehensive cleft care workshops are overall well received by participants and have a positive perceived impact on their clinical practices. In-person attendance is associated with significantly higher satisfaction and perceived impact on practice. Considering that financial and health constraints may limit live meeting attendance, future efforts will focus on making in-person and virtual attendance more comparable.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10556656 and 15451569
Volume :
60
Issue :
10
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs64027593
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656221097820