Back to Search Start Over

Minimally invasive vs. open segmental resection of the splenic flexure for cancer: a nationwide study of the Italian Society of Surgical Oncology-Colorectal Cancer Network (SICO-CNN)

Authors :
Degiuli, Maurizio
Ortenzi, Monica
Tomatis, Mariano
Puca, Lucia
Cianflocca, Desiree
Rega, Daniela
Maroli, Annalisa
Elmore, Ugo
Pecchini, Francesca
Milone, Marco
La Mendola, Roberta
Soligo, Erica
Deidda, Simona
Spoletini, Domenico
Cassini, Diletta
Aprile, Alessandra
Mineccia, Michela
Nikaj, Herald
Marchegiani, Francesco
Maiello, Fabio
Bombardini, Cristina
Zuolo, Michele
Carlucci, Michele
Ferraro, Luca
Falato, Armando
Biondi, Alberto
Persiani, Roberto
Marsanich, Patrizia
Fusario, Daniele
Solaini, Leonardo
Pollesel, Sara
Rizzo, Gianluca
Coco, Claudio
Di Leo, Alberto
Cavaliere, Davide
Roviello, Franco
Muratore, Andrea
D’Ugo, Domenico
Bianco, Francesco
Bianchi, Paolo Pietro
De Nardi, Paola
Rigamonti, Marco
Anania, Gabriele
Belluco, Claudio
Polastri, Roberto
Pucciarelli, Salvatore
Gentilli, Sergio
Ferrero, Alessandro
Scabini, Stefano
Baldazzi, Gianandrea
Carlini, Massimo
Restivo, Angelo
Testa, Silvio
Parini, Dario
De Palma, Giovanni Domenico
Piccoli, Micaela
Rosati, Riccardo
Spinelli, Antonino
Delrio, Paolo
Borghi, Felice
Guerrieri, Marco
Reddavid, Rossella
Source :
Surgical Endoscopy; February 2023, Vol. 37 Issue: 2 p977-988, 12p
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Evidence on the efficacy of minimally invasive (MI) segmental resection of splenic flexure cancer (SFC) is not available, mostly due to the rarity of this tumor. This study aimed to determine the survival outcomes of MI and open treatment, and to investigate whether MI is noninferior to open procedure regarding short-term outcomes. Methods: This nationwide retrospective cohort study included all consecutive SFC segmental resections performed in 30 referral centers between 2006 and 2016. The primary endpoint assessing efficacy was the overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included cancer-specific mortality (CSM), recurrence rate (RR), short-term clinical outcomes (a composite of Clavien-Dindo > 2 complications and 30-day mortality), and pathological outcomes (a composite of lymph nodes removed ≧12, and proximal and distal free resection margins length ≧ 5 cm). For these composites, a 6% noninferiority margin was chosen based on clinical relevance estimate. Results : A total of 606 patients underwent either an open (208, 34.3%) or a MI (398, 65.7%) SFC segmental resection. At univariable analysis, OS and CSM were improved in the MI group (log-rank test p= 0.004 and Gray’s tests p= 0.004, respectively), while recurrences were comparable (Gray’s tests p= 0.434). Cox multivariable analysis did not support that OS and CSM were better in the MI group (p= 0.109 and p= 0.163, respectively). Successful pathological outcome, observed in 53.2% of open and 58.3% of MI resections, supported noninferiority (difference 5.1%; 1-sided 95%CI − 4.7% to ∞). Successful short-term clinical outcome was documented in 93.3% of Open and 93.0% of MI procedures, and supported noninferiority as well (difference − 0.3%; 1-sided 95%CI − 5.0% to ∞). Conclusions: Among patients with SFC, the minimally invasive approach met the criterion for noninferiority for postoperative complications and pathological outcomes, and was found to provide results of OS, CSM, and RR comparable to those of open resection.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09302794 and 14322218
Volume :
37
Issue :
2
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Surgical Endoscopy
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs60715775
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-022-09547-6