Back to Search Start Over

PCR and culture for diagnosis of Acanthamoebakeratitis

Authors :
Yera, Helene
Ok, Vichita
Lee Koy Kuet, Fiona
Dahane, Naima
Ariey, Frédéric
Hasseine, Lilia
Delaunay, Pascal
Martiano, David
Marty, Pierre
Bourges, Jean Louis
Source :
British Journal of Ophthalmology; 2021, Vol. 105 Issue: 9 p1302-1306, 5p
Publication Year :
2021

Abstract

Background/AimsAcanthamoebakeratitis (AK) is a rare but sight-threatening infection. Molecular diagnosis of corneal scraping has improved the diagnosis of AK. Different molecular targets and conditions have been used in diagnosis thus far. In this study, we prospectively compared the performance of five PCR assays on corneal samples for the diagnosis of AK.Methods1217 corneal scraping samples were obtained from patients, for whom an AK was suspected. Sample processing involved both molecular diagnostics and culture. AcanthamoebaPCR assays detected different regions of the Acanthamoebanuclear small-subunit rRNA gene: three final point PCR assays using Nelson, ACARNA and JDP1–JDP2 pairs of primers, and two real-time PCR assays using Acant primer-probe. Human DNA and internal control were co-amplified in the real-time PCR assay to ensure scraping quality and the absence of inhibitors. In the absence of a gold standard, the performance of each test was evaluated using latent class analysis. Genotypes of Acanthamoebaisolates were also characterised.ResultsEstimated prevalence of AK was 1.32%. The sensitivity of Acanthamoebadiagnostic PCRs (73.3% to 86.7%) did not differ significantly from that of culture (66.7%), or according to the target sequence or the technology. Sensitivity could be increased to 93.8% or 100% by combining two or three assays, respectively. PCR specificity (99.3% to 100%) differed between the assays. T4 was the predominant Acanthamoebagenotype (84.6%).ConclusionsCulture and a single PCR assay could lead to misdiagnosing AK. A combination of different PCR assays and improved sample quality could increase diagnosis sensitivity.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00071161 and 14682079
Volume :
105
Issue :
9
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
British Journal of Ophthalmology
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs57470603
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1136/bjophthalmol-2020-316730