Flow and mixing in Ascension, a steep, narrow canyon

A thin gash in the continental slope northwest of Monterey Bay, Ascension Canyon, is steep, with sides and axis both strongly supercritical to M2internal tides. A hydrostatic model forced with eight tidal constituents shows no major sources feeding energy into the canyon, but significant energy is exchanged between barotropic and baroclinic flows along the tops of the sides, where slopes are critical. Average turbulent dissipation rates observed near spring tide during April are half as large as a two week average measured during August in Monterey Canyon. Owing to Ascension's weaker stratification, however, its average diapycnal diffusivity, 3.9 × 10−3m2s−1, exceeded the 2.5 × 10−3m2s−1found in Monterey. Most of the dissipation occurred near the bottom, apparently associated with an internal bore, and just below the rim, where sustained cross‐canyon flow may have been generating lee waves or rotors. The near‐bottom mixing decreased sharply around Ascension's one bend, as did vertically integrated baroclinic energy fluxes. Dissipation had a minor effect on energetics, which were controlled by flux divergences and convergences and temporal changes in energy density. In Ascension, the observed dissipation rate near spring tide was 2.1 times that predicted from a simulation using eight tidal constituents averaged over a fortnightly period. The same observation was 1.5 times the average of an M2‐only prediction. In Monterey, the previous observed average was 4.9 times the average of an M2‐only prediction. As hypothesized, mixing in Ascension is less than in Monterey CanyonA hydrostatic model shows no major sources feeding energy into Ascension CanyonLee waves, rotors from cross flow, and internal tide beams may cause the mixing