Back to Search Start Over

UK consensus guidelines for the delivery of unexpected news in obstetric ultrasound: The ASCKS framework

Authors :
Johnson, Judith
Arezina, Jane
Tomlin, Liz
Alt, Siobhan
Arnold, Jon
Bailey, Sarah
Beety, Hannah
Bender-Atik, Ruth
Bryant, Louise
Coates, Jen
Collinge, Sam
Fishburn, Jo
Fisher, Jane
Fowler, Jan
Glanville, Tracey
Hallett, Julian
Harley-Roberts, Ailith
Harrison, Gill
Horwood, Karen
Hynes, Catriona
Kimm, Lindsay
McGuinness, Alison
Potter, Lucy
Powell, Liane
Ramsay, Janelle
Shakes, Pieta
Sicklen, Roxanne
Sims, Alexander
Stacey, Tomasina
Sumra, Anushka
Thomas, Samantha
Todd, Karen
Torrington, Jacquie
Trueman, Rebecca
Walsh, Lorraine
Watkins, Katherine
Yaz, Gill
Hardicre, Natasha K
Source :
Ultrasound : Journal of the British Medical Ultrasound Society; November 2020, Vol. 28 Issue: 4 p235-245, 11p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

Background Studies indicate there is a need to improve the delivery of unexpected news via obstetric ultrasound, but there have been few advances in this area. One factor preventing improvement has been a lack of consensus regarding the appropriate phrases and behaviours which sonographers and ultrasound practitioners should use in these situations.Aims To develop consensus guidelines for unexpected news delivery in Early Pregnancy Unit and Fetal Anomaly Screening Programme NHS settings.Methods A workshop was conducted to identify priorities and reach consensus on areas of contention. Contributors included interdisciplinary healthcare professionals, policy experts, representatives from third-sector organisations, lay experts and academic researchers (n= 28). Written and verbal feedback was used to draft initial guidance which was then circulated amongst the wider writing group (n= 39). Revisions were undertaken until consensus was reached.Results Consensus guidelines were developed outlining the behaviours and phrases which should be used during scans where unexpected findings are identified. Specific recommendations included that: honest and clear communication should be prioritised, even with uncertain findings; technical terms should be used, but these should be written down together with their lay interpretations; unless expectant parents use other terminology (e.g. ‘foetus’), the term ‘baby’ should be used as a default, even in early pregnancy; at the initial news disclosure, communication should focus on information provision. Expectant parents should not be asked to make decisions during the scan.Conclusions These recommendations can be used to develop and improve news delivery interventions in obstetric ultrasound settings. The full guidelines can be accessed online as supplemental material and at https://doi.org/10.5518/100/24.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1742271X and 17431344
Volume :
28
Issue :
4
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Ultrasound : Journal of the British Medical Ultrasound Society
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs53967229
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/1742271X20935911