Back to Search Start Over

Registered Replication Report on Fischer, Castel, Dodd, and Pratt (2003)

Authors :
Colling, Lincoln J.
Szűcs, Dénes
De Marco, Damiano
Cipora, Krzysztof
Ulrich, Rolf
Nuerk, Hans-Christoph
Soltanlou, Mojtaba
Bryce, Donna
Chen, Sau-Chin
Schroeder, Philipp Alexander
Henare, Dion T.
Chrystall, Christine K.
Corballis, Paul M.
Ansari, Daniel
Goffin, Celia
Sokolowski, H. Moriah
Hancock, Peter J. B.
Millen, Ailsa E.
Langton, Stephen R. H.
Holmes, Kevin J.
Saviano, Mark S.
Tummino, Tia A.
Lindemann, Oliver
Zwaan, Rolf A.
Lukavský, Jiří
Becková, Adéla
Vranka, Marek A.
Cutini, Simone
Mammarella, Irene Cristina
Mulatti, Claudio
Bell, Raoul
Buchner, Axel
Mieth, Laura
Röer, Jan Philipp
Klein, Elise
Huber, Stefan
Moeller, Korbinian
Ocampo, Brenda
Lupiáñez, Juan
Ortiz-Tudela, Javier
de la Fuente, Juanma
Santiago, Julio
Ouellet, Marc
Hubbard, Edward M.
Toomarian, Elizabeth Y.
Job, Remo
Treccani, Barbara
McShane, Blakeley B.
Source :
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science; June 2020, Vol. 3 Issue: 2 p143-162, 20p
Publication Year :
2020

Abstract

The attentional spatial-numerical association of response codes (Att-SNARC) effect (Fischer, Castel, Dodd, & Pratt, 2003)—the finding that participants are quicker to detect left-side targets when the targets are preceded by small numbers and quicker to detect right-side targets when they are preceded by large numbers—has been used as evidence for embodiednumber representations and to support strong claims about the link between number and space (e.g., a mental number line). We attempted to replicate Experiment 2 of Fischer et al. by collecting data from 1,105 participants at 17 labs. Across all 1,105 participants and four interstimulus-interval conditions, the proportion of times the effect we observed was positive (i.e., directionally consistent with the original effect) was .50. Further, the effects we observed both within and across labs were minuscule and incompatible with those observed by Fischer et al. Given this, we conclude that we failed to replicate the effect reported by Fischer et al. In addition, our analysis of several participant-level moderators (finger-counting habits, reading and writing direction, handedness, and mathematics fluency and mathematics anxiety) revealed no substantial moderating effects. Our results indicate that the Att-SNARC effect cannot be used as evidence to support strong claims about the link between number and space.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
25152459 and 25152467
Volume :
3
Issue :
2
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs53586926
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245920903079