Back to Search Start Over

Control Strategies for Afterload Reduction With an Artificial Vasculature Device

Authors :
Giridharan, Guruprasad A.
Cheng, Rolando “Chip”
Glower, Jacob S.
Ewert, Daniel L.
Sobieski, Michael A.
Slaughter, Mark S.
Koenig, Steven C.
Source :
ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs; July-August 2012, Vol. 58 Issue: 4 p353-362, 10p
Publication Year :
2012

Abstract

Ventricular assist devices (VADs) have been used successfully as a bridge to transplant in heart failure patients by unloading ventricular volume and restoring the circulation. An artificial vasculature device (AVD) is being developed that may better facilitate myocardial recovery than VAD by controlling the afterload experienced by the native heart and controlling the pulsatile energy entering into the arterial system from the device, potentially reconditioning the arterial system properties. The AVD is a valveless, 80 ml blood chamber with a servo-controlled pusher plate connected to the ascending aorta by a vascular graft. Control algorithms for the AVD were developed to maintain any user-defined systemic input impedance (IM) including resistance, elastance, and inertial components. Computer simulation and mock circulation models of the cardiovascular system were used to test the efficacy of two control strategies for the AVD: 1) average impedance position control (AIPC)—to maintain an average value of resistance during left ventricular (LV) systole and 2) instantaneous impedance force feedback (IIFF) and position control (IIPC)—to maintain a desired value or profile of resistance and compliance. Computer simulations and mock loop tests were performed to predict resulting cardiovascular pressures, volumes, flows, and the resistance and compliance experienced by the native LV during ejection for simulated normal, failing, and recovering LV. These results indicate that the LV volume and pressure decreased, and the LV stroke volume increased with decreasing IM, resulting in an increased ejection fraction. Although the AIPC algorithm is more stable and can tolerate higher levels of sensor errors and noise, the IIFF and IIPC control algorithms are better suited to maintain any instantaneous IM or an IM profile. The developed AVD impedance control algorithms may be implemented with current VADs to promote myocardial recovery and facilitate weaning.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10582916 and 1538943X
Volume :
58
Issue :
4
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
ASAIO Journal: A Peer-Reviewed Journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs48385245
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1097/MAT.0b013e318256bb50