A Comparison of Porous and Non‐Porous Teflon Membranes Plus Demineralized Freeze‐Dried Bone Allograft in the Treatment of Class II Buccal/Lingual Furcation Defects: A Clinical Reentry Study

MLA

Lamb, James W., et al. “A Comparison of Porous and Non‐Porous Teflon Membranes Plus Demineralized Freeze‐Dried Bone Allograft in the Treatment of Class II Buccal/Lingual Furcation Defects: A Clinical Reentry Study.” Journal of Periodontology, vol. 72, no. 11, Nov. 2001, pp. 1580–87. EBSCOhost, https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.11.1580.

APA

Lamb, J. W., Greenwell, H., Drisko, C., Henderson, R. D., Scheetz, J. P., & Rebitski, G. (2001). A Comparison of Porous and Non‐Porous Teflon Membranes Plus Demineralized Freeze‐Dried Bone Allograft in the Treatment of Class II Buccal/Lingual Furcation Defects: A Clinical Reentry Study. Journal of Periodontology, 72(11), 1580–1587. https://doi.org/10.1902/jop.2001.72.11.1580

Chicago

Lamb, James W., Henry Greenwell, Connie Drisko, Robin D. Henderson, James P. Scheetz, and George Rebitski. 2001. “A Comparison of Porous and Non‐Porous Teflon Membranes Plus Demineralized Freeze‐Dried Bone Allograft in the Treatment of Class II Buccal/Lingual Furcation Defects: A Clinical Reentry Study.” Journal of Periodontology 72 (11): 1580–87. doi:10.1902/jop.2001.72.11.1580.