Back to Search Start Over

Model-based registration of preprocedure MR and intraprocedure US of the lumbar spine

Authors :
Behnami, Delaram
Sedghi, Alireza
Anas, Emran
Rasoulian, Abtin
Seitel, Alexander
Lessoway, Victoria
Ungi, Tamas
Yen, David
Osborn, Jill
Mousavi, Parvin
Rohling, Robert
Abolmaesumi, Purang
Source :
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery; June 2017, Vol. 12 Issue: 6 p973-982, 10p
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Epidural and spinal needle insertions, as well as facet joint denervation and injections are widely performed procedures on the lumbar spine for delivering anesthesia and analgesia. Ultrasound (US)-based approaches have gained popularity for accurate needle placement, as they use a non-ionizing, inexpensive and accessible modality for guiding these procedures. However, due to the inherent difficulties in interpreting spinal US, they yet to become the clinical standard-of-care. A novel statistical shape $$+$$ + pose $$+$$ + scale (s $$+$$ + p $$+$$ + s) model of the lumbar spine is jointly registered to preoperative magnetic resonance (MR) and US images. An instance of the model is created for each modality. The shape and scale model parameters are jointly computed, while the pose parameters are estimated separately for each modality. The proposed method is successfully applied to nine pairs of preoperative clinical MR volumes and their corresponding US images. The results are assessed using the target registration error (TRE) metric in both MR and US domains. The s $$+$$ + p $$+$$ + s model in the proposed joint registration framework results in a mean TRE of 2.62 and 4.20 mm for MR and US images, respectively, on different landmarks. The joint framework benefits from the complementary features in both modalities, leading to significantly smaller TREs compared to a model-to-US registration approach. The s $$+$$ + p $$+$$ + s model also outperforms our previous shape $$+$$ + pose model of the lumbar spine, as separating scale from pose allows to better capture pose and guarantees equally-sized vertebrae in both modalities. Furthermore, the simultaneous visualization of the patient-specific models on the MR and US domains makes it possible for clinicians to better evaluate the local registration accuracy.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18616410 and 18616429
Volume :
12
Issue :
6
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs41556353
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11548-017-1552-2