Back to Search Start Over

Evaluating Sharps Safety Devices Meeting OSHA's Intent

Authors :
Pugliese, Gina
Germanson, Teresa P.
Bartley, Judene
Luca, Judith
Lamerato, Lois
Cox, Jack
Jagger, Janine
Source :
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology; July 2001, Vol. 22 Issue: 7 p456-458, 3p
Publication Year :
2001

Abstract

AbstractThe Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) revised the Bloodborne Pathogen Standard and, on July 17, 2001, began enforcing the use of appropriate and effective sharps devices with engineered sharps-injury protection. OSHA requires employers to maintain a sharps-injury log that records, among other items, the type and brand of contaminated sharps device involved in each injury. Federal OSHA does not require needlestick injury rates to be calculated by brand or type of device. A sufficient sample size to show a valid comparison of safety devices, based on injury rates, is rarely feasible in a single facility outside of a formal research trial. Thus, calculations of injury rates should not be used by employers for product evaluations to compare the effectiveness of safety devices. This article provides examples of sample-size requirements for statistically valid comparisons, ranging from 100,000 to 4.5 million of each device, depending on study design, and expected reductions in needlestick injury rates.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
0899823X and 15596834
Volume :
22
Issue :
7
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Infection Control & Hospital Epidemiology
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs36548347
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1086/501934