Back to Search Start Over

Assessing asymmetry using reflection and rotoinversion in biomedical engineering applications

Authors :
Hill, Shannon
Franco-Sepulveda, Esteban
Komeili, Amin
Trovato, Alexandra
Parent, Eric
Hill, Doug
Lou, Edmond
Adeeb, Samer
Source :
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine; May 2014, Vol. 228 Issue: 5 p523-529, 7p
Publication Year :
2014

Abstract

Symmetry is a trait that has been extensively reviewed, especially clinically, as an indication of ideal geometry and health. Many geometric symmetry assessment techniques rely on two-dimensional measurements that do not account for the three-dimensional nature of the object. In this article, two methods, reflection and a process termed rotoinversion, a combination of reflection and rotation, are presented as potential methods to assess an object’s deviation from symmetry. With reflection, the geometric models are reflected about a calculated best plane of symmetry. With rotoinversion, the models are reflected about an arbitrary plane and then rigidly translated and rotated to best align the translated and original models. The methods give the same results for bilaterally symmetric objects, but different results for bilaterally and rotationally symmetric objects. The two methods are applied to assess asymmetry in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis torso geometric models, producing similar results. There was an angle of 0.408° between the normal to the plane of reflection from the reflection process and the normal from the rotoinversion process and average rotation of 0.067° from rotoinversion. The most appropriate method depends on the purpose of the symmetry assessment and must be determined on a case-by-case basis.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
09544119
Volume :
228
Issue :
5
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part H: Journal of Engineering in Medicine
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs32856408
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1177/0954411914531115