Reduced responsiveness of rat mesenteric resistance artery smooth muscle to phenylephrine and calcium following myocardial infarction

We evaluated responses of peripheral resistance arterial smooth muscle to α1‐adrenoceptor stimulation in a rat model of heart failure in relation to neurohumoral changes, wall structure, receptor density and cellular calcium handling.Plasma samples and third order mesenteric artery side‐branches were obtained from Wistar rats after induction of left ventricular infarction (MI) or sham surgery. Vessels were denuded of endothelium, sympathectomized, depleted of neuropeptides, and mounted in a myograph for recording of isometric force development in response to calcium, agonist and high potassium. Also, the morphology of these preparations was determined. Separate vessel segments were used in radioligand binding assays with [3H]‐prazosin.At 1 week after MI, circulating plasma levels of adrenaline, angiotensin II, atrial natriuretic factor (ANF) and vasopressin were significantly elevated. At 5 weeks only a significant elevation of ANF persisted.At 5 weeks after MI, the structure of the vessels and responsiveness to high potassium or Bay K 8466 (10−6mol l−1) were not modified. Yet, at this stage, sensitivity to phenylephrine was increased (pD2: 6.24±0.04 vs 5.98±0.04 for controls) while maximal contractile responses to phenylephrine in the presence of 2.5 mmol l−1calcium (2.26±0.28 vs 3.53±0.34 N m−1) and the sensitivity to calcium in the presence of phenylephrine (pD2: 2.81±0.22 vs 3.74±0.16) were reduced. Responses to the agonist in calcium‐free solution and the calcium sensitivity in the presence of 125 mmol l−1potassium or of phorbol myristate acetate (PMA, 10−6mol l−1) were not altered.At 5 weeks after MI, the density of prazosin binding sites was not reduced (4.04±1.40 vs 2.29±0.21 fmol μg−1DNA in controls).In conclusion, myocardial infarction leads in the rat to a reduction of contractile responses of mesenteric resistance arterial smooth muscle to α1‐adrenoceptor stimulation. This seems to involve impaired agonist‐stimulated calcium influx.