Back to Search Start Over

Plasma and skin suction-blister-fluid pharmacokinetics and time course of the effects of oral mizolastine

Authors :
Chosidow, O.
Dubruc, C.
Danjou, P.
Fuseau, E.
Espagne, E.
Bianchetti, G.
Thenot, J. P.
Herson, S.
Rosenzweig, P.
Revuz, J.
Source :
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology; June 1996, Vol. 50 Issue: 4 p327-333, 7p
Publication Year :
1996

Abstract

Abstract: Objective:To investigate plasma and skin suction-blister-fluid pharmacokinetics of oral mizolastine in order to determine whether the drug concentration in the fluid of suction-induced skin blisters could better predict the antihistamine activity than the plasma concentration. Setting:Department of Internal Medicine, Université Paris 6.Subjects:Ten healthy male volunteers.Methods:The volunteers (mean age 26.8 years, mean weight 75.8 kg) received a single 10-mg oral dose of mizolastine at 1000 hours. The pharmacokinetic study included 11 plasma and 9 blister fluid samples and blister epidermal-roof specimens. Mizolastine was assayed by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Each volunteer also received nine intradermal injections of 5 μg histamine. Antihistamine activity was assessed as the post-treatment percentages of changes in the histamine-induced relative wheal and flare areas versus baseline. Results:Mizolastine mean C<subscript>max</subscript> (SD) and median t<subscript>max</subscript> were, respectively, 380 ng ⋅ ml<superscript>−1</superscript>and 0.8 h in plasma, and 21.8 ng ⋅ ml<superscript>−1</superscript> and 10 h in blister fluid. Mizolastine could not be quantified in the epidermis. The maximal histamine-induced relative flare inhibition was 72.5% and was attained at the median time of 3 h post-dosing and therefore was delayed by 2.2 h with respect to the plasma t<subscript>max</subscript>. Mean relative wheal inhibition, although lower, showed the same time profile. A direct relationship could not be found between drug concentrations in blister fluid and antihistamine activity. Simulated concentrations in the peripheral compartment better explain the maximum inhibition effect on flare, observed 3 h post-dosing, with a flatter hysteresis loop obtained when plotting relative flare inhibition versus plasma or blister-fluid drug concentrations. Conclusion:The mizolastine concentrations in the skin suction-blister fluid were not predictive of the antihistamine activity.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00316970 and 14321041
Volume :
50
Issue :
4
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs16146251
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s002280050117