Back to Search Start Over

Uptake and toxicity of copper and zinc for the African earthworm,Eudrilus eugeniae (Oligochaeta)

Authors :
Reinecke, A. J.
Reinecke, S. A.
Lambrechts, H.
Source :
Biology and Fertility of Soils; December 1996, Vol. 24 Issue: 1 p27-31, 5p
Publication Year :
1996

Abstract

Growth rate change in earthworms is considered to be a suitable endpoint when determining sublethal effects. In this study we evaluated growth and maturation in the vermicomposting earthworm speciesEudrilus eugeniae as marker of sublethal toxicity of copper and zinc. We also compared routes of uptake. Apart from exposing worms experimentally for 73 days to contaminated food, a series of contact filter paper tests was also performed to determine LD<subscript>50</subscript> for copper and zinc. Both copper and zinc at sublethal concentrations affected growth and maturation in worms exposed to contaminated food. These worms had a copper content of 34.5 µg g<superscript>-1</superscript> after 73 days and a zinc content of 184.9 µg g<superscript>-1</superscript>, showing a differential uptake. Copper was more toxic than zinc. Also in the contact test worms did take up more zinc than copper and the LD<subscript>50</subscript> (48 h) for copper was 0.011 mg cm<superscript>-2</superscript> and for zinc 0.066 mg cm<superscript>-2</superscript>, which translated to body burdens of 6 µg g<superscript>-1</superscript> for copper and 131 µg g<superscript>-1</superscript> for zinc. Indications were that a regulatory mechanism existed for both metals. Both metals were taken up through the body wall at a relatively fast rate. This study indicated that the skin was the major route of metal uptake. This study also showed a poor relation between the two types of tests for purposes of evaluating lethality of zinc and copper.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
01782762 and 14320789
Volume :
24
Issue :
1
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Biology and Fertility of Soils
Publication Type :
Periodical
Accession number :
ejs15083010
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01420216