Back to Search
Start Over
Synthesis and Characterization of the First Niobocene Germyl Complexes and Reactivity of Triphenylsilyl-, Triphenylgermyl-, and Triphenylstannylniobocene Derivatives. X-ray Molecular Structures of d<SUP>0</SUP> Nb(η<SUP>5</SUP>-C<INF>5</INF>H<INF>4</INF>SiMe<INF>3</INF>)<INF>2</INF>(H)<INF>2</INF>(EPh<INF>3</INF>) (E = Ge, Sn)
- Source :
- Organometallics; April 13, 1998, Vol. 17 Issue: 8 p1523-1529, 7p
- Publication Year :
- 1998
-
Abstract
- Thermal treatment of Nb(η<SUP>5</SUP>-C<INF>5</INF>H<INF>4</INF>SiMe<INF>3</INF>)<INF>2</INF>(H)<INF>3</INF> (<BO>1</BO>) with the appropriate organogermanium hydrides (HGeR<INF>3</INF>) and HSnPh<INF>3</INF> gives the corresponding niobocene germyl hydrides Nb(η<SUP>5</SUP>-C<INF>5</INF>H<INF>4</INF>SiMe<INF>3</INF>)<INF>2</INF>(H)<INF>2</INF>(GeR<INF>3</INF>), GeR<INF>3</INF>&dbd;GePh<INF>3</INF> (<BO>2</BO>), GePh<INF>2</INF>H (<BO>3</BO>), GeEt<INF>3</INF> (<BO>4</BO>), Ge(C<INF>6</INF>H<INF>13</INF>)<INF>3</INF> (<BO>5</BO>), Ge<SUP>i</SUP>Am<INF>3</INF> (<SUP>i</SUP>Am = CH<INF>2</INF>CH<INF>2</INF>CH(CH<INF>3</INF>)<INF>2</INF>) (<BO>6</BO>), Ge(C<INF>6</INF>H<INF>13</INF>)<INF>2</INF>Cl (<BO>7</BO>), Ge<SUP>i</SUP>Am<INF>2</INF>Cl (<BO>8</BO>), Ge(C<INF>6</INF>H<INF>13</INF>)<INF>2</INF>H (<BO>9</BO>), Ge<SUP>i</SUP>Am<INF>2</INF>H (<BO>10</BO>), and Nb(η<SUP>5</SUP>-C<INF>5</INF>H<INF>4</INF>SiMe<INF>3</INF>)<INF>2</INF>(H)<INF>2</INF>(SnPh<INF>3</INF>) (<BO>11</BO>) in good yields. Spectroscopic data indicate the presence of only one of the two possible structural isomers in which the germyl or stannyl group is in the equatorial plane with a symmetrical structure. Reactivity studies on the series Nb(η<SUP>5</SUP>-C<INF>5</INF>H<INF>4</INF>SiMe<INF>3</INF>)<INF>2</INF>(H)<INF>2</INF>(ER<INF>3</INF>), E = Si (<BO>12</BO>), Ge (<BO>2</BO>), Sn (<BO>11</BO>), were carried out. <BO>12</BO> reacts with H<INF>2</INF> to give <BO>1</BO>, but <BO>2</BO> and <BO>11</BO> were unreactive toward this reagent. Furthermore, a similar behavior was observed with CO and CN(2,6-Me<INF>2</INF>C<INF>6</INF>H<INF>3</INF>). Thus, <BO>12</BO> reacts with these reagents to give rise, after elimination of HSiPh<INF>3</INF>, to Nb(η<SUP>5</SUP>-C<INF>5</INF>H<INF>4</INF>SiMe<INF>3</INF>)<INF>2</INF>(H)(CO) and Nb(η<SUP>5</SUP>-C<INF>5</INF>H<INF>4</INF>SiMe<INF>3</INF>)<INF>2</INF>(H)(CN(2,6-Me<INF>2</INF>C<INF>6</INF>H<INF>3</INF>)), respectively, while <BO>2</BO> and <BO>11</BO> do not react. Reactions of <BO>12</BO> with HGePh<INF>3</INF> and HSnPh<INF>3</INF> and of <BO>2</BO> with HSnPh<INF>3</INF> gave σ-bond metathesis products, but no reactions were observed between <BO>2</BO> and HSiPh<INF>3</INF> or between <BO>11</BO> and HSiPh<INF>3</INF> or <BO>11</BO> and HGePh<INF>3</INF>. The kinetics of these processes have been studied by <SUP>1</SUP>H NMR spectroscopy and indicated the following reactivity trends Nb−SiPh<INF>3</INF> > Nb−GePh<INF>3</INF> > Nb−SnPh<INF>3</INF> for the different processes considered. The X-ray molecular structures of <BO>2</BO> and <BO>11</BO> were established by diffraction studies. The two isostructural complexes show a bent-sandwich coordination with the two hydrides flanking either side of the Nb−Ge and Nb−Sn bonds (2.710(1), 2.830(1) Å in <BO>2</BO> and <BO>11</BO>, respectively).
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 02767333 and 15206041
- Volume :
- 17
- Issue :
- 8
- Database :
- Supplemental Index
- Journal :
- Organometallics
- Publication Type :
- Periodical
- Accession number :
- ejs1152933