Back to Search
Start Over
Maximal Cardiorespiratory Fitness Testing in Individuals With Chronic Stroke With Cognitive Impairment: Practice Test Effects and Test-Retest Reliability.
- Source :
- Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation; Nov2013, Vol. 94 Issue 11, p2277-2282, 6p
- Publication Year :
- 2013
-
Abstract
- Abstract: Objectives: To evaluate, for individuals with chronic stroke with cognitive impairment, (1) the effects of a practice test on peak cardiorespiratory fitness test results; (2) cardiorespiratory fitness test-retest reliability; and (3) the relationship between individual practice test effects and cognitive impairment. Design: Cross-sectional. Setting: Rehabilitation center. Participants: A convenience sample of 21 persons (men [n=12] and women [n=9]; age range, 48–81y; 44.9±36.2mo poststroke) with cognitive impairments who had sufficient lower limb function to perform the test. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measure: Peak oxygen consumption (Vo <subscript>2</subscript>peak, ml·kg<superscript>−1</superscript>·min<superscript>−1</superscript>). Results: Test-retest reliability of Vo <subscript>2</subscript>peak was excellent (intraclass correlation coefficient model 2,1 [ICC<subscript>2,1</subscript>]=.94; 95% confidence interval [CI], .86–.98). A paired t test showed that there was no significant difference for the group for Vo <subscript>2</subscript>peak obtained from 2 symptom-limited cardiorespiratory fitness tests performed 1 week apart on a semirecumbent cycle ergometer (test 2–test 1 difference, −.32ml·kg<superscript>−1</superscript>·min<superscript>−1</superscript>; 95% CI, −.69 to 1.33ml·kg<superscript>−1</superscript>·min<superscript>−1</superscript>; P=.512). Individual test-retest differences in Vo <subscript>2</subscript>peak were, however, positively related to general cognitive function as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination (ρ=.485; P<.026). Conclusions: Vo <subscript>2</subscript>peak can be reliably measured in this group without a practice test. General cognitive function, however, may influence the effect of a practice test in that those with lower general cognitive function appear to respond differently to a practice test than those with higher cognitive function. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00039993
- Volume :
- 94
- Issue :
- 11
- Database :
- Supplemental Index
- Journal :
- Archives of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 91693703
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmr.2013.03.016