Back to Search
Start Over
Managing Chemistry Underground: Is Co-Sequestration an Option in Selected Formations?
- Source :
- Energy Procedia; Mar2011, Vol. 4, p4457-4464, 8p
- Publication Year :
- 2011
-
Abstract
- Abstract: Geochemical simulations indicate that co-injection of CO<subscript>2</subscript> and SO<subscript>2</subscript> results in mineral sequestration of SO<subscript>2</subscript>. The amounts sequestered are greater and more persistent in dolomite and basalt than in glauconitic sandstone. In a predominantly dolomite formation, dissolution of calcite, and to a lesser extent, dolomite, will provide Ca in solution to promote the precipitation of anhydrite, thus removing the SO<subscript>2</subscript> from solution. In basalt, dissolution of basaltic glass under acidic conditions provides Ca and Fe in solution, which promotes the sequestration of SO<subscript>2</subscript> as anhydrite and, eventually, pyrite. As magnetite in the formation is consumed, pyrite redissolves. In the basalt, 86% to 47% of the SO<subscript>2</subscript> remains sequestered after 5000 years. In glauconitic sandstone, SO<subscript>2</subscript> precipitates as alunite, but it eventually redissolves. After 5000 years, 87% to 0% of the SO<subscript>2</subscript> remains sequestered in the glauconitic sandstone. In all cases, co-injection of 1% SO<subscript>2</subscript> with CO<subscript>2</subscript> did not appreciably reduce the amount of CO<subscript>2</subscript> sequestered, and did not induce a measureable change in porosity versus injection of CO<subscript>2</subscript> alone. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 18766102
- Volume :
- 4
- Database :
- Supplemental Index
- Journal :
- Energy Procedia
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 59802026
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2011.02.400