Back to Search Start Over

Stakeholder attitudes on carbon capture and storage — An international comparison.

Authors :
Johnsson, Filip
Reiner, David
Itaoka, Kenshi
Herzog, Howard
Source :
Energy Procedia; Feb2009, Vol. 1 Issue 1, p4819-4826, 8p
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

Abstract: This paper presents results from a survey on stakeholder attitudes towards Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS). The survey is the first to make a global comparison across three major regions; USA, Japan, and Europe. The 30-question survey targeted individuals working at stakeholder organizations that seek to shape, and will need to respond to, policy on CCS, including electric utilities, oil & gas companies, CO2-intensive industries and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). The results show generally small differences across the regions and between the different groups of stakeholders. All believed that the challenge of significant reductions in emissions using only current technologies was severe. There is a widespread belief both that renewable technologies such as solar power and CCS will achieve major market entry into the electricity sector within the next 10 to 20 years, whereas there is more skepticism about the role of hydrogen and especially nuclear fusion in the next 50 years. All groups were generally positive towards renewable energy. Yet, there were some notable areas of disagreement in the responses, for example, as expected, NGOs considered the threat of climate change to be more serious than the other groups. North Americans respondents were more likely to downplay the threat compared to those of the other regions. The Japanese were more concerned about the burden that would be placed on industry in the coming decade as a result of emissions constraints and NGOs were more likely to believe that the burden would be light or very light. NGOs believed CCS to be far more attractive than nuclear fusion power but much less than renewables. As expected, the risk for leakage from reservoirs was ranked number one of the risk options given. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18766102
Volume :
1
Issue :
1
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Energy Procedia
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
41785762
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.309