Back to Search Start Over

An evaluation of Midwifery Group Practice: Part II: Women’s satisfaction.

Authors :
Fereday, Jennifer
Collins, Carmel
Turnbull, Deborah
Pincombe, Jan
Oster, Candice
Source :
Women & Birth; Mar2009, Vol. 22 Issue 1, p11-16, 6p
Publication Year :
2009

Abstract

Summary: Background: Midwifery Group Practice (MGP) is a continuity of midwifery care model for women of all levels of pregnancy risk available at a tertiary metropolitan hospital in Australia. This paper presents Part II of the demonstration study exploring the effectiveness of MGP, and reports on women’s satisfaction with the model of care. Methods: A Maternal Satisfaction Questionnaire was developed and sent to all women (n =120) enrolled in MGP over a three-month period. The questionnaire comprised two open-ended questions asking women to list up to three things they liked and did not like about MGP, and a structured section exploring levels of satisfaction through a five-point Likert response format. The open-ended questions were analysed using qualitative content analysis, and analysis of the structured part of the questionnaire was undertaken by comparing mean scores of satisfaction ranging from −2 (very negative attitudes) to +2 (very positive attitudes). Results: Of the 120 women who were sent a Maternal Satisfaction Questionnaire, 84 returned their questionnaire (70% response rate). Three overarching themes were identified in the content analysis of open-ended questions, namely: Continuity of care; Accessibility; and Personal and professional attributes of the midwife. Analysis of the structured part of the questionnaire showed that women were satisfied with the care they received in MGP, as indicated by positive scores on all questions. Conclusions: Women being cared for in MGP are satisfied with their care. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
18715192
Volume :
22
Issue :
1
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Women & Birth
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36482113
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wombi.2008.08.001