Back to Search Start Over

Assessment of Argumentative Writing.

Authors :
Allal, Linda
Espéret, Eric
Galbraith, David
Grabowski, Joachim
Kellog, Ronald
Mason, Lucia
Milian, Marta
Ransdell, Sarah
Tolchinsky, Liliana
Torrance, Mark
Piolat, Annie
Tynjala, Païvi
van Wijk, Carel
Rijlaarsdam, Gert
van den Bergh, Huub
Couzijn, Michel
Oostdam, Ron
Source :
Effective Learning & Teaching of Writing; 2004, p427-442, 16p
Publication Year :
2004

Abstract

When producing an argumentative text, writers have to solve problems that are specific for that type of text. The nature and severity of these problems, i.e., the specific problem area of argumentation in written discourse, can be characterized with the help of concepts from the pragma-dialectical argumentation theory (Van Eemeren & Grootendorst, 1984). It is assumed that during the writing process language users will have to appeal to knowledge and skills corresponding with these concepts in order to overcome problems. In this chapter the role of specific knowledge and skills in writing argumentative texts is indicated. A summary is given of the different stages of writing discursive texts and the specific problems connected with these stages (section 2). On the basis of the results of an assessment study of argumentation skills, it is illustrated to what extent the marked problems occur in secondary school students' writing (section 3). For some of the problems found, writing advice is formulated (section 4). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISBNs :
9781402027246
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Effective Learning & Teaching of Writing
Publication Type :
Book
Accession number :
33896071
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-2739-0_29