Back to Search Start Over

Primary Stability of Three Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedures: A Biomechanical In Vitro Study.

Authors :
Kitamura, Nobuto
Yasuda, Kazunori
Tohyama, Harukazu
Yamanaka, Masanori
Tanabe, Yoshie
Source :
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopy & Related Surgery; Aug2005, Vol. 21 Issue 8, p970-978, 9p
Publication Year :
2005

Abstract

Purpose: Posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction procedures have not been thoroughly evaluated under cyclic loading conditions. We tested the hypothesis that PCL reconstruction with a quadrupled flexor-tendon graft and fixation using tapes and staples is biomechanically superior to that fixed with sutures, a button, and a post-screw, and is comparable to reconstruction with a bone—patellar tendon—bone (BPTB) graft. Study Design: In vitro biomechanical study. Methods: A total of 45 porcine knees were used. The quadrupled flexor-tendon graft was fixed using the suture/button/post-screw procedure in 15 knees, and with the tape/staples procedure in another 15 knees. The remaining 15 knees underwent reconstruction with a BPTB graft secured with screws as the standard control. In each group of 15 knees, 5 underwent tensile testing without cyclic loading, and 10 underwent the same tensile test after 5,000 cycles of load-controlled or displacement-controlled loading. Results: Each type of cyclic loading produced larger biomechanical changes in the knees fixed with the suture/button/post-screw procedure than in the knees secured using the other 2 procedures. Conclusions: In PCL reconstruction, the tape/staples procedure is biomechanically superior to the suture/button/post-screw procedure, and is comparable to the BPTB/screws procedure with regard to the ultimate failure load. Neither of the procedures using the quadrupled flexor-tendon graft was comparable to the BPTB graft in linear stiffness and the initial displacement after load-controlled cyclic testing. Clinical Relevance: The biomechanical behaviors of PCL-reconstructed knees are significantly different, depending on surgical techniques. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
07498063
Volume :
21
Issue :
8
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopy & Related Surgery
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
23242638
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2005.05.025