Back to Search Start Over

Quantitative Computed Tomography and Response to Pronation in COVID-19 ARDS.

Authors :
Zadek, Francesco
Berta, Luca
Zorzi, Giulia
Ubiali, Stefania
Bonaiti, Amos
Tundo, Giulia
Brunoni, Beatrice
Marrazzo, Francesco
Giudici, Riccardo
Rossi, Anna
Rizzetto, Francesco
Bernasconi, Davide Paolo
Vanzulli, Angelo
Colombo, Paola Enrica
Fumagalli, Roberto
Torresin, Alberto
Langer, Thomas
Source :
Respiratory Care; Nov2024, Vol. 69 Issue 11, p1380-1391, 12p
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of prone position (PP) has been widespread during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whereas it has demonstrated benefits, including improved oxygenation and lung aeration, the factors influencing the response in terms of gas exchange to PP remain unclear. In particular, the association between baseline quantitative computed tomography (CT) scan results and gas exchange response to PP in invasively ventilated subjects with COVID-19 ARDS is unknown. The present study aimed to compare baseline quantitative CT results between subjects responding to PP in terms of oxygenation or CO2 clearance and those who did not. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective observational study including critically ill, invasively ventilated subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS admitted to the ICUs of Niguarda Hospital between March 2020-November 2021. Blood gas samples were collected before and after PP. Subjects in whom the P<subscript>a</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript> /F<subscript>IO</subscript><subscript>2</subscript> increase was ≥ 20 mm Hg after PP were defined as oxygen responders. CO<subscript>2</subscript> responders were defined when the ventilatory ratio (VR) decreased during PP. Automated quantitative CT analyses were performed to obtain tissue mass and density of the lungs. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five subjects were enrolled, of which 116 (93%) were O<subscript>2</subscript> responders and 51 (41%) CO<subscript>2</subscript> responders. No difference in quantitative CT characteristics and oxygen were observed between responders and non-responders (tissue mass 1,532 ± 396 g vs 1,654 ± 304 g, P = .28; density -544 ± 109 HU vs -562 ± 58 HU P = .42). Similar findings were observed when dividing the population according to CO<subscript>2</subscript> response (tissue mass 1,551 ± 412 g vs 1,534 ± 377 g, P = .89; density -545 ± 123 HU vs -546 ± 94 HU, P = .99). CONCLUSIONS: Most subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS improved their oxygenation at the first pronation cycle. The study suggests that baseline quantitative CT scan data were not associated with the response to PP in oxygenation or CO<subscript>2</subscript> in mechanically ventilated subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
00201324
Volume :
69
Issue :
11
Database :
Supplemental Index
Journal :
Respiratory Care
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
180579725
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11625