Back to Search
Start Over
Quantitative Computed Tomography and Response to Pronation in COVID-19 ARDS.
- Source :
- Respiratory Care; Nov2024, Vol. 69 Issue 11, p1380-1391, 12p
- Publication Year :
- 2024
-
Abstract
- BACKGROUND: The use of prone position (PP) has been widespread during the COVID-19 pandemic. Whereas it has demonstrated benefits, including improved oxygenation and lung aeration, the factors influencing the response in terms of gas exchange to PP remain unclear. In particular, the association between baseline quantitative computed tomography (CT) scan results and gas exchange response to PP in invasively ventilated subjects with COVID-19 ARDS is unknown. The present study aimed to compare baseline quantitative CT results between subjects responding to PP in terms of oxygenation or CO2 clearance and those who did not. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective observational study including critically ill, invasively ventilated subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS admitted to the ICUs of Niguarda Hospital between March 2020-November 2021. Blood gas samples were collected before and after PP. Subjects in whom the P<subscript>a</subscript>O<subscript>2</subscript> /F<subscript>IO</subscript><subscript>2</subscript> increase was ≥ 20 mm Hg after PP were defined as oxygen responders. CO<subscript>2</subscript> responders were defined when the ventilatory ratio (VR) decreased during PP. Automated quantitative CT analyses were performed to obtain tissue mass and density of the lungs. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-five subjects were enrolled, of which 116 (93%) were O<subscript>2</subscript> responders and 51 (41%) CO<subscript>2</subscript> responders. No difference in quantitative CT characteristics and oxygen were observed between responders and non-responders (tissue mass 1,532 ± 396 g vs 1,654 ± 304 g, P = .28; density -544 ± 109 HU vs -562 ± 58 HU P = .42). Similar findings were observed when dividing the population according to CO<subscript>2</subscript> response (tissue mass 1,551 ± 412 g vs 1,534 ± 377 g, P = .89; density -545 ± 123 HU vs -546 ± 94 HU, P = .99). CONCLUSIONS: Most subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS improved their oxygenation at the first pronation cycle. The study suggests that baseline quantitative CT scan data were not associated with the response to PP in oxygenation or CO<subscript>2</subscript> in mechanically ventilated subjects with COVID-19-related ARDS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Subjects :
- BLOOD gases analysis
ADULT respiratory distress syndrome
PATIENTS
PULMONARY gas exchange
T-test (Statistics)
COMPUTED tomography
LYING down position
SCIENTIFIC observation
KRUSKAL-Wallis Test
FISHER exact test
RETROSPECTIVE studies
MANN Whitney U Test
CHI-squared test
DESCRIPTIVE statistics
MEDICAL records
ACQUISITION of data
ANALYSIS of variance
PATIENT positioning
COVID-19
MECHANICAL ventilators
REGRESSION analysis
Subjects
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 00201324
- Volume :
- 69
- Issue :
- 11
- Database :
- Supplemental Index
- Journal :
- Respiratory Care
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- 180579725
- Full Text :
- https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.11625